Perhaps we need to start by simply changing the language - worked for the TRAs after all…
Don’t talk about blockchains. Refer to them if you must as consensus mechanisms that are non -performant and resource- hungry
2 Likes
A lot of interesting bits in here. These Messari people need to learn about SN - what will be the best NFT platform possible IMO.
Web3?
Where we’re going… is,
“Web4 U”
1 Like
With all the Web3 stories, it seems to me that grabbing some of the search traffic for ‘web3’ would be a great way to organically spread the word about Safenet.
2 Likes
It’s serious enough but could be a lot worse, and no doubt it will…
7 Likes
Feels like a familiar predicament. Just imagine the traffic we would get………
3 Likes
So, what is the difference between dWeb and web3? Are they the same/similar? Is one a subset of the other? It would be good to understand this and prepare the argument for safe network.
1 Like
I am getting the impression that we might be better to not associate Safe with Web3. Lets leapfrog Web3 and in any discussions point to the web3 being a flash in the pan, a failed experiment. Go for web 4 where not only is all data belonging to the user, but there is no servers, and forever storage. It is a persistent storage network with the web being serverless having user owned data.
15 Likes
Leapfrog you say?
Safe Web 109999999!
3 Likes
I say we go for Web 4 Professional, Industrial, or even Military grade. 
4 Likes
Hmmm just seems to me to be massive amounts of missing the boat going on with this approach.
2021 has seen the announcement of a handful of Ethereum L2 projects that sometimes seem to be described in terms of Web3.
There are now numerous articles that have been linked here that all describe Web3 in terms that are reminiscent of Safenet.
For whatever reason, and whatever anyone thinks it is, Web3 is current. And to me - at least - sounds a lot like this incredible project
3 Likes
My personal Twitter account has been suspended for “harassment and wishing others harm” for the following tweet. I’m appealing, but I think it’s an interesting example of the increasing online censorship, of a tweet which is criticising a politician who in my opinion is responsible for tens of thousands of his people’s deaths:
@adamboultonSKY I’m tempted to say I’d have Johnson over so I could punch him on the noise on behalf of all the bereaved families of the 150,000 he’s let die for his vanity, but I’m not the nasty piece of work that he is.
It may be faulty AI, or maybe people think this is incitement? I’d be interested to know if anyone thinks this is a breach of the rule. They want me to delete the tweet but I haven’t yet, but I don’t know if it is visible.
Update:
Appeal rejected: “Our support team has determined that a violation did take place, and therefore we will not overturn our decision”. They don’t explain why of course and now my only options are to ditch the account or delete the tweet, and I think give up my phone number which I’m unlikely to do. I ‘left’ my Facebook account when they insisted I agree to their updated terms after the GDPR came in. Less time on Twitter is probably a good thing overall.
That seems a very wide interpretation of “wishing others harm”. I don’t see how it meets that so Twitter are going to be well over the top it seems.
Update:
To recover my account I must delete the tweet and “By clicking Delete, you acknowledge that your Tweet violated the Twitter Rules.” which I disagree with.
10 Likes
I wouldn’t flag a post for that. Context matters.
2 Likes
Yeh, they’ve hidden my tweet so I can’t show it on context but it was a reply to one about having Johnson over for dinner. Can’t remember exactly, but think it was a joke.
2 Likes
More on Twitter censorship moves:
https://twitter.com/dcuthbert/status/1474332852787552271?s=20
2 Likes
3 Likes