[ValentinesNet] [14/2/24 Testnet] [Offline]

[Knosis]

Which command to do that?

[aatonnomicc]

safe wallet address

[Knosis]

Thank you!
aa597b8ba613c2cd88b9511becdc11fd023d620eda79182bc91b080d1218762ff6264df58ba0b3d88cfc6f8ef712bcff

[Toivo]

@Knosis

aa597b8ba613c2cd88b9511becdc11fd023d620eda79182bc91b080d1218762ff6264df58ba0b3d88cfc6f8ef712bcff

safe wallet receive 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

There’s 30 for you!

[aatonnomicc]

here is some more

safe wallet receive 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

[Knosis]

Thank you!
Thanks guys

[Shu]

Sent you 1200000000000000000 NanoTokens - happy uploading or transferring .

safe wallet receive 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

[joshuef]

@Shu

metric by itself wasn’t a valid feature and cargo build complained about it. So, I tried with --features metrics,open-metrics which seems to have produced a valid binary, but no luck in getting more of the other stats populated under the /metrics endpoint.

I may have to wait for a future testnet I suppose for some of that functionality to be re-enabled.

cc @roland what’s the correct setup here atm?

@Shu

Also, just curious if the faucet is down, can another member of the community spin up a new faucet or is 100% of whatever the genesis funds were set to are already claimed by the faucet’s wallet address on start up

A new faucet could be started and funded by anyone with some $$. Although the current one gets all the money from genesis as things stand.

That’ll change soon.

@Shu

Is this some sort of double spend here or whatever may be the term?

Yeh it will be attempting to double spend now.

Can you see the commit hash in your logs of the faucet build?

(If it’s still happening we’ll need a test to check this i think @anselme)

cc @Anselme good exercise to see if anything is slipping through the cracks here.

@Shu

Now, whether this should have been prevented, i.e the claim of the genesis supply a 2nd time …

I believe a PR that’s gone in over the last days would have prevented this startup. before that we weren’t checking if a DBC had been spent before we credited it to our wallet (whatever wallet, the faucet should now bug out with this).

@Shu

I realize all of this faucet concept is under development and is a work in progress, and MaidSafe likely didn’t intend anyone to change the limit from 100 coins to such a high amount, so forgive me for experimenting around against this testnet…

All good. Great to be poking at this and seeing what you;re up to

[Shu]

@joshuef

Can you see the commit hash in your logs of the faucet build?

Not sure if this question was raised towards me? If so, not sure where to look now after having run the cargo build command a while back. The faucet’s version shows up as:

sn_faucet 0.3.67

Overall, very exciting to see the network inch closer to the finish line (core components)!

Great work team!

Based on the testing over the weekend, below were some additional points off concerns (summary):

• If the wallet gets corrupted (or has these unconfirmed transactions state), its preventing uploads and transferring of coins, and if the solution is to wipe out the wallet folder, well that will likely not fly with the consumer who just lost his or her balance (assuming the priv key gets removed too), lol.
• Application panic in safe client when a file address is provided as an input for a folder download
  • [ValentinesNet] [14/2/24 Testnet] - #396 by Shu
• There have been a few occasions where the network has uploaded chunks that didn’t exist on the network, but charged 0 payments for it (see some of my earlier comments below):
  • [ValentinesNet] [14/2/24 Testnet] - #417 by Shu
  • [ValentinesNet] [14/2/24 Testnet] - #405 by Shu

Maybe some of these are already in-flight or have been fixed since the snapshot off ValentinesNet testnet.

[joshuef]

@Shu

Not sure if this question was raised towards me? If so, not sure where to look now after having run the cargo build command a while back. The faucet’s version shows up as:

It was! thanks

@Shu

well that will likely not fly with the consumer who just lost his or her balance (assuming the priv key gets removed too), lol.

It could be rebuilt. It’s just nuclear cleanup at the mo while the wallet is fleshed out and we move away from (implicit) chocolate coins to something… meatier?

@Shu

Application panic in safe client when a file address is provided as an input for a folder download

• [ValentinesNet] [14/2/24 Testnet] - #396 by Shu

@Jason_Paul this might be another one for you to dive into next.

@Shu

There have been a few occasions where the network has uploaded chunks that didn’t exist on the network, but charged 0 payments for it (see some of my earlier comments below):

• [ValentinesNet] [14/2/24 Testnet] - #417 by Shu
• [ValentinesNet] [14/2/24 Testnet] - #405 by Shu

@anselme I’m not sure if you know off the top of your head what might be going on here?

[Shu]

@joshuef

It could be rebuilt.

I see. Is that just dependent on keeping a copy of main_pubkey and main_secret_key in a backup location and copying those files back to the default paths such as ~/.local/share/safe/client/wallet, in which case the safe client will re-use those again?

Just curious, what does the wallet file by itself hold on the location above? Is that the file that needs to be blown away at the moment to reset the state etc?

[joshuef]

@Shu

I see. Is that just dependent on keeping a copy of main_pubkey and main_secret_key in a backup location and copying those files back to the default paths such as ~/.local/share/safe/client/wallet, in which case the safe client will re-use those again?

Yup. @mav is rightly keen for us to get to a tight / more secure wallet process and I think that will aid here a lot. We’d work on folk having to backup wallet seed phrases eg. That would probably be the first step. Then we automate the wallet rebuild/recovery so such nuclear issues are no longer necessary, eg.

It’ll come, and is hopefully not too far away!

[cryptoidiot]

is this longest testnet?

[joshuef]

Ah, actually @shu the protective PR is not yet in as we’ve failing tests there just now. So you’d still be seeing this with latest faucet.

[aatonnomicc]

I have two machines at 100% on there hard drives and the rest are between 95% and 98%

[peca]

I guess this is the end. There is excessive traffic probably due to full nodes being unable to replicate correctly and I don’t want to provoke my ISP too much, I have already 25 TB of traffic on this testnet. I am pulling the plug.

[storage_guy]

I’m not sure it’s the final end! Yes, I can see traffic is way up over the last couple of hours. However, downloads are still working and so are uploads albeit more slowly. The point is they aren’t totally failing. Could it be that some nodes have left but some others have joined as well?

In the past we’ve seen testnets go into a death spiral a lot more rapidly than this when lots of nodes have been removed. We might yet weather this storm as well. Don’t forget the removal of the hard limit of 2048 records so there is extra firepower of many nodes having more disk space. In the past all nodes have got to 2048 at roughly the same time and that has jammed it up suddenly.

I think the network is bigger as well this time.

12 hour graphs from AWS Instance with 1 node:-

[Optimator]

30 nodes run from home. Traffic and memory have definitely picked up.

[joshuef]

@Shu sterling work with double spending! @anselme has dug in, replicated and found the issue (a TODO that’s been neglected).

Seems like the core issue is related to nodes trusting incoming replicated spends blindly instead of validating them. There is a potential fix here , though we’ll be working up some repro tests for CI to verify this and prevent regressions there.

Thanks for diving in and trying things! It’s all helpful!

[dirvine]

@joshuef

Thanks for diving in and trying things! It’s all helpful!

Can I add to this @Shu It’s been incredibly helpful and a non obvious bug, mind you we had a TODO to investigate this one and you did that for us.

@joshuef I think we need to start adding a contributors to our readme etc. Github only does PRs etc. but there are so many more ways to help.