thats why it won’t be indivisible 
there are many years old super-simple concepts for divisibility and other newer ideas that have their own up-sides - i have 0 doubt safecoin will be divisible
6 Likes
well I doubt it will ever exist at this point 
then i wonder why you are spending your time here 
what makes me very much doubting your statement and i believe you just want to buy more cheap maid 
7 Likes
Not to mention @Wallet111 ignores the fact it could be years and years, possibly a decade or more before all 4.3 billion are in existence. 
6 Likes
I mean this in the least offensive way possible, but your constant complaining despite the well known facts (as outlined below) kind of reminds me of my nephew when he decides there’s nothing you can say to make him happy.
- It will likely take decades before 4.3B Safecoin exist at once
- Safecoin will obviously be divisible (there are so many topics about it on this forum)
- When 4.3B Safecoin exist it would be ludicrous for one coin to be as cheap as $100 (that would be tantamount to a $430B market cap—a number that Bitcoin is like to reach this year)
But, you know, we all show frustration in different ways—some more constructive than others, I suppose… 
19 Likes
That’s what they said about Amazon, Google and Apple share prices once upon a time. Dare to imagine the impossible
Well, when folks like me do some back of the envelope calculations they tend to use the numbers that you can find lying around in some other envelopes. I think there is not much you can do about it, it will stick because it is so widely spread and any closer look would be a bit of work.
On the other hand, who cares if it is 1 or 4 billions? It’s only fourfold difference, which doesn’t mean that much when we are talking about gains in the ballpark of 1000x - 2000x, or even more.
This huge potential actually makes me think that maybe I don’t need to get that much MAID after all. I am as greedy as the next person, but I must say that I really hate how this greed often takes over me and makes me spend my time thinking of money when there could be something else to do. 
5 Likes
Let me know when you do that. I will join you and we can split the bill 
1 Like
As long as it is not at Trump Turnberry
1 Like
Imho MAID price never took off big time because many investors just hate the prospect of their stake being diluted by 1000% inflation.
The only argument that it might take a long time to be inflated doesn’t change that. If the coin would have been structured in a way so that holders preserve their stake and only lost reaktive share when they request services from the network it would have taken of long ago like similar assets.
1 Like
1000% inflation?..
Current MAID circulation is around 450m coins, and network max will be around 4.5bn coins (4.5bn = 450m x 1000%, or 10x).
The only answers I’ve seen so far as to why this dilution is needed are based on the network being unable to operate a viable market for resources without having a big stash of Safecoin to subsidise farmers, which I don’t think is / needs to be the case (technical tweaks would be required to accommodate this, but thankfully test Safecoin is still a long way off).
I’d be very happy if the dilution were eliminated or greatly reduced, unless there is a good reason to keep it. One such reason might be to make sure the majority of Safecoin is eventual held by network contributors & users rather than early investors, but in terms of the raw economics of the network, I don’t see a need.
2 Likes
Lots of coins and tokens have farming/mining, so I am not convinced that is the issue.
I think people just think the project is too hard and/or is taking too long. Combined with no time scales from the team, I just don’t think people feel comfortable investing at this stage.
I personally know people who say they support the project and would love to use it in the future, but they aren’t happy to invest or are happier to invest in other top 20 crypto.
Imo, this will change when alpha 3 and 4 start to show firm results. The challenge is keeping SAFENetwork in their thoughts for when this happens.
9 Likes
I agree.
Having 4 billion coins for a network that could replace the current internet is but a drop in the bucket if a large amonut of cash, which is currently 10.5 trillion in cash world wide, is replaced through the network economy.
I think a lot of investors don’t fully understand the potential of safe net.
In a way I’m glad for this right now. Perhaps I’m being a bit paraniod, but having the project under the radar is not necessarily a bad thing as it is being built. Apparently Trump wants to control and centralize the 5g network coming up. I feel the project could make a lot of people worried about thier fortunes and systems of control.
Once the network is released no one can stop it, and the price will rise.
9 Likes
Very true, It will explode that’s for sure.
7 Likes
Imagine once we’ll remember these moments, speaking bout price and improvements.
We’ll see a total different scenario and I hope we’ll come together thinking bout these years. Maybe is right to say we are early supporters of this project but sure is right to say that we’re like a big family fighting for one aim. Once we’ll celebrate, I want to do it with you my fellows! 
16 Likes
I have talked about Maid with many crypto early adopters.
Generally They see Maid as never ending projet.
One Guy told me it took 10years to move to alpha 2, check the roadmap, another 10y to move to alpha 4, and even then at alpha 4 you still don’t have safecoin.
Was hard for me to reply.
Also they see us as fanatics cut out from the rest of the crypto crowd. On guy told me we are a sect.
Depressing.
It’s all about perception and brand really.
I think a full rebrand could do wonders.
Change name, move to ERC20 token for the new brand. Rule out 4.5 bn coin and state there will be only 450m.
Antshares did rebranding with Neo. Why can’t we do this.
Was not a fan of moving to ethereum, but the latest delisting and losing the top 100 mkt cap leave us with little choice I am afraid.
5 Likes
I’m just as greedy as the next guy, but all this talk about price and marketing feels a bit, I don’t know, empty? as long as there actually is no product. Even bitcoin is still far from being a usable currency. What I like about the SAFE project is that it actually is about new technology - not just hype and making a quick buck. If the technology is made to work, money will come. Some dude calling us a sect now is not going to change that fact. “E pur si muove.”
20 Likes
Exactly. If this team goes out on a limb and turns into an attention whore for the sake of pretending to be relevant in the most superficial way, these very same people who are now laughing at MAID for progressing too slowly or even being a vaporware will confidently say “they lost it, they’re finished as serious contenders for anything but the loudest frog-croak of the week”.
Why would you ever let people who put you down (mis)guide your steps?
Before Beta, less is more. The very moment MAID steals any shitcoin’s spotlight, everything that can be turned against MAID will get overblown and dumped on this project like a sac of you-know-what. The moment you attract volumes and volumes of average crypto investors of today and for years to come, this team will be called out on every little suspicion generated by their crooked brains and the dev updates will turn into a countdown to the day of lambo.
This wouldn’t be a problem if we knew for sure that the network will be up and running in ten months. But we don’t know how long is the rest gonna take. You can only sell torso to museums. MAID is building the future. If we go and try to sell things instead of just talking about the idea, we will turn MAID into a vaporware.
16 Likes
It’s not some dude.
Crypto early adopter worth millions, involved in many high profile crypto projects, investor in dozen pending ICO (telegram first round for instance…) talking to to many crypto professionals.
This guy saying we are a sect, with all his knowledge and connections makes you think twice.