DataPaymentNet [26/7/23 Testnet] [Offline]

No. I saw no info on where the log dir was.

3 Likes

I did this and checked wallet balance after and I did not pay twice. But curious why it did the whole upload and download (verify) a second time when it knew it was already uploaded (as payment for those chunks had already been made)? What am I misunderstanding about the process?

4 Likes

17 of the little darlings now.

But a few errors uploading Southside’s Stones collection, eg:

Storing file '09 Mother's Little Helper.m4a' of 2456976 bytes (6 chunk/s)..
Did not store all chunks of file '09 Mother's Little Helper.m4a' to all nodes in the close group: Network Error Could not retrieve the record after storing it: Key(b"\xf4\x95xX~S\x8b\x84t\xd9\xc3.\xd9y\xebc\xbe\xfc\x88\xe7\xe7\xf9\x8d\xc8+\xde\xa86\xd1\xf9\xc6\xa9").
6 Likes

Thank you for the really easy instructions.

I’m running a VM on a home proxmox server. No port forwarding.

Receiving payment works well.

safe files download bbb915a0756c69ee6d2af0eaea69b54b7a110cc6a5f3891801ad162650c879c9

I also managed to download my file.

I’ve included the output from --help because I am really happy with the command line tool,
and its detailed help.

This was a painless, pleasant testnet experience. No waiting around to wait to be connected, this was all instant. None of that ancient blockchain technology sync waiting time.

Receiving payment, spending payment to upload a file, and a successful file download.

This is very exciting.

Thank you Maidsafe.

17 Likes

My output:

$ SN_LOG=all safe --log-output-dest data-dir files upload hello.txt

Logging to directory: “/root/.local/share/safe/client/logs”
Using SN_LOG=all
Built with git version: 1262368 / main / 1262368
Instantiating a SAFE client…

5 Likes

ahh!, you are right, I just missed it. Tired.

2 Likes

How long did this take @JPL, I have 3 with zero and need to get moving, got up at 4.30am to get a early start on my day but now I am sitting at my pc looking for records instead. :crazy_face:

6 Likes

30 mins to an hour I guess. Not more than an hour.

4 Likes

Ahhh ok. Thanks!

3 Likes

You cannot be left alone for a moment! :wink:
What a test this will be! :smiley: :+1:

When connecting from your home computer, will the NAT status still be set to private?

3 Likes

Should be, yep!


A note on current status:

We’ve thus far lost 0 nodes. Which is a great place to be again (the last few testnets had dropped nodes before I even got the post up!). Let’s see how it holds up over a few days, but that’s certainly a better start.

Here’s the stats from a randomly chosen “newer” node (ie, one of the last 50 i put up, that would have less chunks than those I started + tested with):

Node PeerId                                             PID      Memory (MB)     CPU (%)    Record Count
12D3KooWQKLwiHme3Ux4pFJBdf6C1bVhLA7uVWKU83XuykyHbZkY    8964     36.543          13.3       48
12D3KooWCwMnLSWpTobV2vod6vXid2okRtugYnjn3tjpLwVN3aDB    9101     90.8477         0.0        83
12D3KooWPPR5JWkJLtoTC1G7N13FWTwGoM3mQaPypE5cPyrtfKWD    9012     54.0273         20.0       122
12D3KooWAsdgfnDxTdkFtvVkC9hrfnGVTBygkhfbfEtN5VQwr6sc    8924     64.9766         0.0        67
12D3KooWKkLSJK1xspMj6hrTJHPUSC1rV23sNdWX7Kgix6nTGde1    9022     68.625          0.0        52
12D3KooWLcuuA81YT6AtEm6GAEZxpqPFDXYRePQ3xq85cvwGWR83    9032     42.4023         0.0        64
12D3KooWKGw5NeVseWrMoht5hJCiUu2aWeX3pQAeueTGbVKQq6Dq    9052     62.1875         0.0        127
12D3KooWJ37QqTvtqSrMUQfGMorbUE8fRLqZWjjkGx5ZaQBLNvah    8983     62.3125         0.0        106
12D3KooWHbXmwAFMK6gf5u7rtKberSiyAoRPNEjCQULRSHYYEHPB    8974     41.0664         0.0        78
12D3KooWCXvZUWcuMX2439TPDbaM7XEvR3J1tTLmiiziPTkx4Pnn    8934     83.5156         0.0        88
12D3KooWDNCQFwQ67ufzHX92dFXeP8DDka8M9BspuXTo9msPVgqP    9081     129.477         0.0        50
12D3KooWBS9kvRWCKCWVost285yHsEwbvtfkizqmB1Buso8YKcBv    9042     42.1016         0.0        44
12D3KooWNux7VhJQ9f1tW4wt3AyPiJmiALrQWXL7Ks9jZ1qf81MC    9062     37.5781         0.0        37
12D3KooWLR7sWPpqLhCTtaqyB6ikMU6bNhRYKZRoxgtzyJjWoPKs    8944     96.7695         0.0        107
12D3KooWBxxUB5RYEi9bHFQcEXuBJ1MWs86N8YUVBiqGmgK5kP66    9091     40.1133         0.0        27
12D3KooWHG1xArAhE4GTKzsHUi1oUFvHxF3mXKU9MdnDA8KqsR9S    9111     43.9844         0.0        84
12D3KooWJQYpM5pMJiLhpJmAtFUYNcYEZ93Qjx9e7n7GSdxigzwD    9071     76.9297         25.0       75
12D3KooWSNqR1sdCmZ8nt2B9eePWXPRXn97r3jHK63e4BLznAoDT    8954     41.9766         0.0        41
12D3KooWCzLDtNS6pXVQtfpN4dq8zG2wSPduoKLH8f6mnDb68W5P    8992     87.8047         0.0        164
12D3KooWGPyCuLkZMBVTcRTv59LTDmW5K1rACtxJ4qV3fXxGBYqa    9002     76.082          0.0        109
19 Likes

You guys are getting closer… Can you feel it? That gut feeling there?

13 Likes

No but happy to see first time? Payment testing, but still skeptical or in better words: still expect long time to finish

2 Likes

All we can do is see progress and individually all make conclusions on how long and are we there yet.

In my mind and I have said this in many meetings recently (board, foundation etc.) I believe we no longer have a technical issue, it’s all positioning, messaging, partnerships and economics. I think those are easily solved, but the positioning and messaging are gonna be vital, but we are well through a project to establish the route there.

35 Likes

Its getting closer!

10 Likes

Hmm, upload fail


root@localhost:~# SN_LOG=all safe --log-output-dest data-dir files upload logsjune15.tar.gz 
Logging to directory: "/root/.local/share/safe/client/logs"
Using SN_LOG=all
Built with git version: 1262368 / main / 1262368
Instantiating a SAFE client...
⠐ 0/20 initial peers found.                                                                                                                                                                                                                   The client still does not know enough network nodes.
🔗 Connected to the Network                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Preparing (chunking) files at 'logsjune15.tar.gz'...
memory allocation of 2132480841 bytes failed
Aborted (core dumped)

EDIT chunking/encryption too much for a small (1G) vm maybe?

2 Likes

@joshuef is this one of the multiple nodes per droplet, as in a certain risk of early loss despite the good start?

I have a couple of scripts that rely on a hard-coded peer to automate periodic uploads/downloads, so a loss will mess me up.

I can probably loop some peers or run a node of my own with enough resources to reduce the risk of loss.

I see some benefit in Maidsafe having one such stable node to help prevent the need to update the OP after a loss.

Either way, I am happy to do whatever I need for my stuff to work but if the posted peer has reasonable chance of staying up I would rather not bother.

6 Likes

yeh, 20 nodes per droplet.

the first node is solo on the same machine as the faucet. Won’t get much more stable than that one: /ip4/178.62.79.112/tcp/46803/p2p/12D3KooWJnPhTVEnv7rx9ZCZZZRgTxrts33m33sKWfDdFH4jBcGo

(Although i just checked again and we’ve still got all nodes alive, so so far so good!)

9 Likes

What do you mean?
No bugs? No critical bugs? No possibility for critical bugs?

1 Like

I have a cloud node running :partying_face: and beginning to PUT/GET (one of each so far).

Laptop and cloud got tokens from fawcet :partying_face:

Laptop uploading :partying_face:

Cloud uploading :partying_face:

EDIT: earlier issue was wrong SAFE_PEERS value! :blush:

9 Likes