@rusty.spork @JimCollinson can I count on a reply, a node reset that causes loss of earnings looks like a serious bug.
Maybe itās because of that:
Does anyone know how they are doing their āaveragesā
For instance if normal average then it is not that useful for Autonomi sizing
If 10 people with Gb/s up test and 100 people with 10Mb/s up then normal average is
10x1000 + 100x10 divided by 110 giving 100Mb/s average. Arguably not all that useful for determining the average home userās internet. How many of those 1Gb/s were data centre VPS being tested by the person?
or 5 x 5Gb/s, 10 x 2.5Gb/s, 20 x 1Gb/s, 1000 x 40Mb/s and 500 x 20Mb/s resulting in
(25000 + 25000 + 20000 + 40000 + 10000) / 1535 = 120,000 / 1535 = 78.2Mb/s average
From that you get the impression that 750 people are above and 750 people are below that average. But in fact 1500 people are way below and 35 people are way above.
So if we sized the network for 100Mb/s upload speed assuming those at 78 - 100Mb/s should work, we would have a network were 35 people think all is fine and 1500 people are mostly unable to utilise nodes.
This is why I do not accept the notion that its just a case of pushing for better internet since its not 1/2 the population excluded but 97% excluded.
Yes it should not be that bad but it should illustrate that using your personal situation and statistics is not a good measure of whether to go with a very high requirement for ones network configuration.
But rather do the test and LISTEN to the people. Not what your system is capable of. A common trap people fall into, and something I had to teach other programmers not to fall into that trap of basing performance on their optimised system(s)
Iām not sure, this announcement was posted on 7 Oct and the leaderboard was announced on 8 Oct, so the announcement hopefully came after the correct earnings were reported. Also,I am missing the nanos I earned earlier this week, which disappeared after the nodes reset, which I think is unrelated.