Thats lazy, you disagree yet don’t have the actual figures to back it up, why should I do the work to show your errors when you won;t do it and expect others to do your work
1 Like
so glad I have this yin on mute.
I cant ignore the fact he posted but I am spared his content.
he’s “managerial” class…
2 Likes
Can’t figure out what Australians are smoking or if their world is upside down because they are on the backside of the earth, but it is your turn to do some working and explaining.
“Truth is like poetry. And most people fucking hate poetry.” Adam McKay, The Big Short:
a reminder
2 Likes
1 Like
Bachelor major is in financial management and accounting, you are not totally wrong for once.
1 Like
Please remember this is supposed to be a fun giveaway program.
3 Likes
You ignore the very reason I gave you.
I repeat what the team have said on how it works
And you take one value out of a different distribution curve and make a narrative about it.
You disagree with the statements yet will not do the actual work to show how its wrong.
Add up all the values and not take one datum point for a different distribution curve, you are looking quite the fool here not doing the efforts to prove your point.
If indeed its wrong then do the work to show it.
Then do accounting. You are showing you do not apply your skills here
3 Likes
Attacking me isntead of showing proof to claims that don’t make sense.
Just crazy… LoL I am not going to comment on that, just waow!
If you are not will to do the work to show its wrong then you are both lazy or not willing to admit you could be wrong.
Do the work and I’ll be happy to admit the team is wrong and back you up.
Until then stop with your silly empty insults showing a childish nah your wrong, “this stone is larger than your stone, so all stones are larger than yours”
No I am telling you to use your claimed skills and do the work and stop being lazy.
3 Likes
If you don’t understand the simplest logic, that a group of around 800 that has a pool of 250k, that they can’t make almost the double of those in a group of around 200 sharing a pool of 250k, on similar position, then you are so far of from understanding general math and logic that it would be easier for me to explain to a dolphine.
But you can’t let anyone else be right so you go full on attack with even more claims. That tells something. If you were right then it would be easy, you would not have to attack me but to show that you are right.
The only one calling silly names is you with your Australian attacks etc
I have said you are being lazy, you show one datum point and claim something.
Use your accounting skills to actually show the difference instead of using a single datum point.
And like I said if you show your claim with actual evidence then I will back you up with the team to show what they said is not happening and somehow using higher amounts (maybe even double the 250K)
But instead you are wanting everyone else to do your work for you. One datum point on a different distribution is not going to cut it with any auditing of figures.
But claiming because one datum point is different and it looks like its double then it has to be double is lazy accounting. Show its double
You made the claim the team is getting it wrong and I’ve said a few times now I will gladly admit you are right about it being double if you did the work.
3 Likes
I have shown my numbers, they are correct as of general logic and I am correct In general logic about the distribution.
That means I am right until someone shows otherwise.
You have not shown anything, zero.
So it is not me who should do the work.
One figure does not make logic nor plural.
If the team is wrong in their statements then take on an auditor’s role and show them how they are wrong. You are trying to show Maidsafe’s financial officer that does the figures that he is getting it wrong. Trying to focus on me just because I repeat the statements made by @JimCollinson and belittling me for it doesn’t show anything.
And trying to do the uno card on who should do the work is so silly, its a child’s game. You made the claim the team is getting it wrong, then its obvious who has the responsibility to use more than one actual figure difference in a different distribution.
This is the last I have to say on it because I can see you will just reverse what I said and throw it back on me. And again I will say that you need to stop being lazy and show why you think the team is getting it wrong with some real auditing skills your accounting course will have taught you.
1 Like
The numbers are on a picture, they can’t be downloaded and I don’t have the distribution formula. But you make claims that makes no sense but I am the only one who should show things and do the work, not fair in my book.
But there is no need to do calculations because it is very obvious just by looking at the rewards distribution for both groups, if understanding the logic that If A is greater than B and B is greater than C then A is also greater than C.
At least look at the leaderboards for both wave 1 and 2, ask yourself how the group with 4x more particiapants can earn that much more on every position if both waves started with 250k.
Even with wave 2 17% shorter total weeks, the difference should not be that great every week, expectations would be that a group with 4x more participants would earn way less even when they run 17% less total weeks.
Oi!! thats my job!!!
2 Likes
haha - did nobody ever do a sum-up? xD
…i just did because this was still going on and the team didn’t respond yet…
wave2 participants have a sum of 750k spread across them according to the official leaderboard (wave 1 is at 250k) 
so all of us are wrong (or they already knew on start of wave2 they’ll do a x2 to get to 500k for wave 2 and the +50% for wave 3 to get to 750k afterwards 
)
xD this sum-up raises more questions than it answers xD
8 Likes
The loud voices wouldn’t do the work and expected everyone to do it for them.
I asked them to do their own work. I was interested to hear the results but I wasn’t so bothered if the team was right in their statements or were doing something different.
Can you see what the sum is for those who have earnings. If you haven’t then no bother
I suspect that the no earners are getting a fixed amount and that is above and beyond the 250K/10 value the earners should be getting
2 Likes
Actually doing approx 800 non earners x 10 weeks + 250K is about 750K So there might be something in that thought.
Anyhow if you don’t want to check its fine. The team usually has a good reason for doing things different from what they initially said and have considered the implications.
3 Likes