My problem, and I’m not the only person thinking this, is with asking people to go to Google and post information that is clearly sensitive to many. We can be confident that Google are hoovering all of this - including identifiers from the visit and not just what is posted on the form. Then using it for all manner of things, and have no qualms sharing it or feeding it into AIs that are insecure and so on.
For a privacy aware project the choices made for convenience are to me shocking. Your question baffles me too. Perhaps you are fine using Google et al, but many of us have been avoiding places like that for years and have been supporting this project because of our despair at how hard it is to maintain a semblance of privacy online these days.
It may baffle you that I could be so obtuse to not understand what you meant by your one word crutique, but at least my question has been productive as you’ve clarified that the problem your saw is to do with the use of the Google form rather than Autonomi asking the question they did.
Until creating a MetaMask wallet to participate in the node rewards program, I’ve only ever used omniwallet.org. The addresses in my omniwallet.org account have the private keys stored within them. That will surely be supported I hope?
what precisely is this about?! the question asked cannot be the question they want an answer to … the question probably is: “do you have means to sign a message with the private key on which your MAID are stored (or have access to the seed phrase/private key for the bitcoin address)?” but somehow ask what wallet is used instead …
Maybe they want views on if they can use KYC or have riots on their hands by the people holding expecting not to give away private information. You can always add that info to the “other”. But then on google forms. LOL privacy on one hand and take it away on the other.