Launch Planning: Community Update šŸš€

Unless Autonomi is running out of money and they need to exit, I think the project should abandon the ERC20 path and wall this garden with the native token. It’s already been 18 years. Whats another 3 years to finish it up and polish the network so it can be truly ready.

We shouldn’t need to depend on exchanges at all. In fact, id rather them not be involved if we’re going to have a token implemented. I dont care about interoperability with any external network. I dont care about converting tokens to fiat. I dont want to deal with eth, gas, smart contracts, or any of that crypto nonsense. I only want to build on Autonomi.

1 Like

A valid desire. Other people have other valid desires. Maybe wait until the technology is proven to work and join an Autonomi copy that suits your desires?


Check out the Dev Forum

3 Likes

I mean ALL investors, shareholders, token holders, equity investors. ALL of them, Then added to that the financial rewards folk will get from running nodes. They need FIAT on/off ramps or else settle for many years of hoping for them eventually.

I have not said that and in fact I think it’s the opposite of greed that is driving many of these folk.

I do

I don’t know where you are getting this from. We will not be owning that vast supply and never planned to. Anything the foundation had to look after would not be theirs to spend. In any case that parts under review atm.

Suggesting I hold or we control the vast sums is wrong. So perhaps we have a comms issue there, but the legal structure of the (Swiss)foundation does not allow it to benefit from any holdings it looked after for the 70% or whatever %. As I said though, that emissions is being considered further.

17 Likes

This is also proposed to be 70% → now to 14% inc vesting etc.

I think many of @Bogard dreams are coming true.

Cheer up folks! :smiley:

9 Likes

Are you aware of the recent news update regarding total max supply halved from 4,4 to 2,2 billion?

Just want to check as I could not figure that out, if that was the case, from the comment.

3 Likes

Storj never integrated the network ERC20 token as a way to pay for data storage and none of the decentralized data storage networks are a pay once for eternal storage, other than Autonomi.

3 Likes

Just a note that Arweave is supposed to do pay-once-store-forever, but I think that’s the only other one.

But overall, I expect Autonomi will be way ahead of alternatives when it launches. Bring it on!

3 Likes

Phala Network is a blockchain platform focused on providing secure and verifiable computation for Web3 applications. It enhances smart contracts by offering decentralized compute capabilities, making them ā€œeven smarter.ā€ By utilizing Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), specifically Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) hardware, Phala ensures that any code and data executed on the network are protected from unauthorized access. This means that developers can build applications with security and privacy guarantees by default.

Very interesting. I wonder if this could be combined with Scrypto . It’s an asset oriented smart contract language based on Rust.

but…

1 Like

Makes you wonder what has not been discovered yet. :frowning:

Intel will have been mandated to include a back door or three.

Sadly until we can get hardware we can audit ourselves, TEEs are just a distraction.

1 Like

Thanks for the responses @dirvine. Good that these are under review. Aligning with sound economic and decentralization principles is critical for the project to be successful. You didn’t address the 15% royalties though. Those should be amongst the first up for review.

@JimCollinson, have you ever invented anything that has made life changing amounts of money? (and from real revenue, not speculation). What would you know about my dreams?

Why are you turning it into an ego question? It is clear from the context that Jim is calmly responding to your specific concerns from your previous post.


Check out the Dev Forum

3 Likes

English isn’t your first language, so I’ll assume you obviously missed what Jim was trying to do with ā€œdreamsā€ there. And it’s not his first.

1 Like

Being light hearted is also a thing and @Dimitar wasn’t wrong really

2 Likes

I wasn’t trying to ā€œdoā€ anything, just pointing out that almost all the things you’ve been harping on about (specifically as they relate to the tokenomics and the subject of this thread, and not about you personally) are addressed, and I thought this would be a positive for you.

So the personal digs seem a bit unnecessary.

7 Likes

Watch the code base :wink:

4 Likes

I hope you don’t go to the other communist extreme and give everything away to everyone? Bitcoin has a reserve to pay another 100 years into the future to miners, Ethereum is infinitely inflationary, the probability that Autonomi can survive without subsidies and a constant upload from the Foundation is nil…


Check out the Dev Forum

4 Likes

We will keep it fair. My opinion (not company official or anything) is that those who work on this get paid as well as those who support it. How they do that is open for us all to partake in,

So there will be a path for paid devs for sure. As I say it’s all up in the air and the team are hard at it. I am certain of a fair distribution we cn all get behind with the reality of paying devs.

15 Likes

It’s very surprising to hear you say this.

Does this mean you don’t think storage on Autonomi will be a compelling enough offering to keep people paying to store data to keep nodes incentivised?

What necessary role do you think subsidies or constant uploads from foundation would play?