Insights of IF voting

Community
21

Hopefully they post the results :joy:

Yes would be nice if more people have a small flutter just for the fun of it.

3 Likes
22

I think the wild ride will start in backing phase, when there is no risk of losing ANTs.

5 Likes
23

That was me. I didnā€™t so much do analysis as vote on a lot (but not all) of the projects that I would like to see happen, even if they donā€™t make it into the top 12.

I guess I did one piece of analysis, which was to grab the address for votes so they can be classified in my tool, but I only needed one vote for that.

I donā€™t invest in votes. I do approve of some of the changes that disincentivize gaming the votes and Iā€™ll leave my criticism to previous posts.

6 Likes
24

There are people who actively violate the rules. By voting from one wallet and moving the money to another wallet, they vote again with quite large sums, changing the ranking of the top 12.

It will be interesting to see if the rules will be enforced or changed post factoā€¦ Maybe they know something the rest of us donā€™t since theyā€™re willing to risk such amounts of ANT.

Check out the Impossible Futures!

2 Likes
25

Can you list the addresses and projects?
Id like to see the rules enforced I would hate to see good projects miss our due to someone gaming !

2 Likes
26

I have purposely not listed them because there is also a possibility of malicious voting with the aim of taking a project out of the game by getting over 50% of the votes and disqualifying it. Letā€™s see what the situation will be after the end of the vote.

Check out the Impossible Futures!

3 Likes
27

Bloody hell why is nothing ever nice and simple :joy:

4 Likes
28

That would be an expensive way to get ahead of the competition.

To me it seems more likely that itā€™s someone trying to boost the votes to protect their ā€˜investmentā€™ of prior votes by staying in the top 12ā€¦ but if someone voted from the same source address via another address, itā€™s a pretty obvious attempt at gaming & Iā€™m sure will still be counted towards 50% of any vote.

Hope this settles down and doesnā€™t turn into a game where some lose out significantly!

2 Likes
29

Thatā€™s wild assumptions stated as facts :face_with_monocle:

Maybe someone sold to his friends ant and eth p2p to vote for projects they all believe in :man_shrugging: :upside_down_face:

Edit:
ā€¦ Or maybe the issue is that when wanting a decent return and the rules demands multiple accounts if nobody else plays this game with youā€¦

4 Likes
30

Yes, he even sold ANT to two of his friends at the same time the same amount. What luck, Iā€™m watching with interest to see if the second friend will vote too.

Check out the Impossible Futures!

5 Likes
31

Totally plausible

file_0000000056346246b86a668b8ef35405
file_0000000056346246b86a668b8ef354051024Ɨ1024 165 KB

4 Likes
32

I was about to suggest this.

Also selling the same amount could just be that personā€™s parcel amount they like using. Be it to friends, OTC, CEX, DEX, family

We cannot be 100% certain and I think that is the point @Dimitar

2 Likes
33

Those ants have back rests built into their bodies? :rofl:

4 Likes
34

We canā€™t be sure, but I wonder if the team will interpret this as: * Your voting shows exploitative or disingenuous on-chain behavior

Check out the Impossible Futures!

6 Likes
35

They made it about money. :money_bag:

6 Likes
36

Rules for making/loosing money can be simple too :wink:

If you want them to be simple (and not to be fairā€¦there is no fairā€¦ )

4 Likes
37

The beginning of ArbiTrack :slightly_smiling_face:

4 Likes
38

What a blessing weā€™re in Blockchain land now and everything is traceable

7 Likes
39

Shurely shome mishtakeā€¦

image
image1920Ɨ1080 146 KB

1 Like
40

Seems ok on my machine at least

2 Likes