Insights of IF voting

Community
1

Hi,

@Pioneer asked in Discord for an analysis of the voting so far.

In the topic you will find a list of all participating apps and their on-chain IDs, if you wants to do your own analysis.

Ant tokens from the votes go to this address (the Foundation) and by clicking on the corresponding transaction in the log you can see the app ID for which the vote was made: Transaction Details / [Logs (2) / 2: appId

screen
screen1125×759 278 KB

The example is with a random address from the blockchain

In the canceled vote, 124085.2 ANT were spent, in the new vote - 70587.70 ANT have been spent on votes so far. Most of the apps in the top 12 have a few hundred votes difference.

The smaller amount of ANTs spent and the close results in the votes tell me that people do not want to bid against each other, but if there are any shifts in the next few days, they will probably have to bid on the last day if they want to protect their investment and not lose their money or if they want to keep the app they voted for in the top 12.

A total of 24 separate addresses voted, 171 transactions, or an average of 7 transactions per address. (This includes 1 address from which I made 34 transactions to extract the app IDs, so the votes without it are 137 transactions from 23 addresses or an average of 6 transactions per address)

Personally, if we were allowed to vote for our own apps, I would vote for Queeni and AntChain, but now I will vote for Colony and Autonomi Browser Extension. I note that I vote once - I will not bid, I do not gamble.

v9-05
v9-051539×679 81.4 KB

app ID:

AI FitBuddy -
43A059EF3F4B26A4801036890475640A28EF59250AC121A90087FD7706760FF9

AntAI - 00822CAA6A50B7565361313E4B99EE512D1B2CBF84E919AEB871D7CF9FF5F81C

AntChain - Time-Proof Your Truth - 9170B2A6D649CAD3D597E74CD6F062595F8D02E92A930F1C7E4F288853348CAF

ArbiTrack -
628DC2BD71596808C4BC1EEA7E0B365CBA241E7250C25FE3F6EA99FC36C3A420

Ark - 423688FE8C18A697B4981F8BC5D077A44DECB5150CF23457EDDDAC01651C9603

ArtistView(AV) - 9447C33997BF54B7D6C757E0BC057374138BB6F8C9B5846C091D1C71C3CAF80E

Auto Wallet - Application Framework - 9E0F70F405FB98815694E223F2BAC0156BD18ACBE511183A5044892AC462B3D0

Autonomi Browser Extension - 486699A1B251EBE6518436CACC7AB3B6B0571B31A9D591ADA84483A4BA993144

Autonomi Community Token - 2FE2EB51BDCAF5DA7CF0A648759DC50EFBD67B528EB303F3ED3C18C85713CBFD

Autonomi Transaction Reporter - F4FE70941D93B84757C3AEE7DD2B3C0FA676D910A35CE3D687BEC796B4D37E97

AutonomiNet - FDC08A0D94763A3FE9DBC9564A3BE9271965C6E7440800DA06D1EE9D58F645FF

AutVid - C1637DA4F9787DFB6E9C3ACA6E73357A9DCE3F1BFC2BD96C2BA39AC54C3D0F7E

CanMan - 2FC34A9D91145F1A11339221CC0CA1B823CDFF3035AD99B2EAE9D926D55C7251

Colony - 1F21EE5CF611227460A65D6D8C7371B37B7F9D25E7C4FC3A1C8AD1DEEDA5FD6C

Friends - 713F53A9197AC68EF258DE4A92C56DA953C696D0325F9C478A6014A675A13591

Historical Weather Data - CDA164DAA02503B49F2F959C067EF243E240E75AB671C8DAED230DA34B7648C1

IMIM - 8C03346F75EFFEDD1F1DD42060C6FE125179CB27BC7EB94DB2B3ACC547BC97BF

Memories - 5FE6C74ECED5DAEEF34ED210B016F59A3908521F4C571C62A8F5D156BD8EE0D0

Mutant - CD762D8092903CA7DB27DBD356A49C335013A68BD26A907FA4AE10539C9716EB

MyLife - AC1D8986F6B0B24F27AAC4D77F220E77EFCF706C3C0692C8E053082774B6AEC0

Nest - 4A605FC2EAA7A887E73D64C3C530342471BA655BB2F9B3368D54529286957DAB

News Site - 73EC1B7668D49197A6D24257FA2526DF69F201028A40AD64AE43FA3AA976F3FA

Perpetual - DD21333C34BBB9833D0CC1143212379C93054C675FF234F72FEE45894C28E637

Personal Soundtrack - C0B064D9C75BF72275349412DF59B9FE1A0F4B91E7496C74FA68904C80CAEF5C

Pirate Radio - 5EA148F0A602F420CFEE794D6796C73CFD44993C8D90556199AEE353DB84B200

Queeni AI Assistant - 6E8732D0839627255BCEE134ECE82A3424BCFEADC0511508613C1228786B3FEB

REGRU - 5EED32D6E916C28EC9936E8C81944DA0481BD227A44BC077AE1F0051B4AB744C

Ryyn - 60105462D3D4BAF2327776856B70D56D95772FD2B256F5252181632F9DE22B95

SafeStoreAPI - F2524FB02FF4BA42800FE4AA8F5333D40926D63B2A88B0047077A39286709814

Screenshot Tool - DF6A482E3955A240420071D990DBD2C4B92307BE2F87B7D3B6600691FFE8FC3F

SOMA - F2F690FF3A9D0780B8CE88E0D794B016347A43C1029392622622DC4AB4BE714A

STASHBAG - 96281B6BA8DEDBB173C92DD85CB17B8D1F5FEF80CB57207C6CED67113B8D1C3F

Vessmere - 6A47215BA66818E23FBFDC8B4CFCF35770C0B36B60D85842B4215815A7E74EFC

w3b.site - 4E3EB5B7545D7D8CB044D756E90A68CBFD4CAD472F18C2395C2D86511E84AC03

Check out the Impossible Futures!

10 Likes
2

Here’s something interesting - we have a whale with 5 million ANTs actively voting. He just needs to be careful not to get more than half the votes, because Bux said that apps that violate the rules will be disqualified:

screen
screen897×224 30.6 KB

Currently, the whale holds 49% of the votes in one of the apps in the top 12.

Check out the Impossible Futures!

5 Likes
3

If they stopped at 49%, it seems like they’re aware and maximising the opportunity, at least in the support of that app.

If they start trying to do it for too many projects it could get dangerous, as doing it for anything that has a chance of being relegated from the top 12 is a risk… but not doing it for anything that is likely to be in the top 12 could be seen as a missed opportunity.

Thanks for gathering the stats. It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out!

4 Likes
4

by now I’m seeing 26 voting addresses with following % ANT of the total (close to 104k ANT atm) spent for their votes

image
image652×462 26.7 KB

6 Likes
5

So its 26 or fewer people voting by this time

I bet at least one person is using 2 (or more) addresses

6 Likes
6

If that’s the case, maybe the team will reconsider the ban on voting for our own apps. I promise to vote for only 1 of ours with @saykor :dragon:

Check out the Impossible Futures!

3 Likes
7

=D does the 50% single voter limit then get removed too or divided by team members for those team members? =D

Or maybe we just don’t care and remove all those hard to enforce rules :sweat_smile:

Trying to make things fair is an impossible endeavour anyway

7 Likes
8

Or we just don’t enforce them and people figure out themselves what the rules really are. :joy:

I think it is strange that to support a trustless, autonomous network we are creating a process with lots of intricacies and rules and centralized planning.

Something doesn’t feel right about this. :thinking:

I wish I had said something about this earlier but I don’t even know what to say now. :man_shrugging:

7 Likes
9

How do they know it’s you who is voting?

4 Likes
10

Nobody knows, its impossible to enforce.

Even if there is a effort to trace the source it simply allows the more educated/determined voters the upper hand.

6 Likes
11

Probably some of us have given our addresses to receive NFT :wink:

Of course I have other addresses where I mine with small amounts. Who would have thought that there would be such things… the whole scheme is super uncharacteristic of MaidSafe, I wonder who came up with it and whether he is satisfied with the hundreds of voters…

Check out the Impossible Futures!

2 Likes
12

Many community members reacted strongly against the plans for voting, and the team said ‘we’re doing it anyway’, so it is what it is.

The voting mechanism may be something to forget ASAP, but the developments made by those working on each team will remain & hopefully provide a strong base for others to build on.

I expect Impossible Futures can still be a big success even if the voting system sucks :sweat_smile:

7 Likes
13

I’m sorry some of you didn’t like the voting system. But what I do know is everyone seems to be happy with all the cool projects building. Its truly your network now that you can build apps and programs. A lot of these will be very useful!

13 Likes
14

Absolutely. The competition is more about fun & participation than anything from the sounds of it, but the substance is in the projects & development work.

It’s an incredibly exciting time for the project with all of these builders working on fantastic, useful, and foundational stuff.

And, while I’m no fan of the voting, I’m a huge fan of what Autonomi has done with Impossible Futures overall, so great work!

5 Likes
15

To be fair I think it’s much better than I expected. The price of a vote going above 1 ANT means it’s keeping the whales from just bashing massive votes in.

All the projects I like the sounds of are doing okay so I’m overall pretty pleased with how it’s going :slight_smile:

7 Likes
16

And we can see that by vote counts. They went 20k first time after few hours, and now it’s stuck under 15k for 3rd day.

3 Likes
17

True the incentive is not there for them.

Looking at it someone could easily turn 1k ANT in to 2k ANT but I see no way someone could turn 200k ANT into 400k ANT. Which I think is a good thing.

I know there is worry about all the share holders getting there ANT after all these years and some people are worried and think we need lots of ANT locked away.

Screw it give them all there ANT and if we have a blood bath so be it we have had them before and then it’s just done and we can move forward without it hanging over the maret.

7 Likes
18

My favorite thing is that there are fewer voters than devs.

Check out the Impossible Futures!

7 Likes
19

Wonder if it’s going to pick up or if we are just going to flat line :joy:

2 Likes
20

If @neo is right that there are voters with more than 1 account, it should be raised. I hope we get past at least 100 unique addresses.

The blockchain shows that someone did my experiment today, voting for everyone to extract the IDs, hopefully they did a more in-depth analysis than mine.

Check out the Impossible Futures!

3 Likes