I still think the local AI assistant that can label/categorise/index your files is the one that can make something like Colony possible, and therefore make a truly decentralised version of the network possible. As far as I can make out the task is ideal for the current crop of language models, though of course still a big piece of work to settle on a schema and put the whole thing together.
I feel like it’s not something I often see mentioned, but I really hope there’s someone out there with time and ability to do it!
If people felt running nodes would be effective in supporting the network, I’m sure more would do it. I feel like it’s a futile effort in the face of the scale of operators who seem only to respond to emissions changes.
I don’t expect running more community nodes would have any impact on token price. Only improvements in economics, demand, and expectations will do that.
Yes, it would be fantastic to see a nice GUI for simple upload and download of folders with Merkle, plus sync/backup options as soon as possible. Hopefully Dave updates in the coming weeks will bring some of this.
Lots of benefits would come with this, which is why I was hoping to do it one day but can’t in the end.
you get lots of storage interfaces for free (including the ones you mention)
rclone is a ready made, proven, very popular GUI, cli (and proto web UI IIRC)
features include upload, download, sync and mounting of remote storage on a local device
it also has an API which is already used by numerous popular apps (backup, sync) which is why I was interested in implementing support for it in the first place: to give me a backup app for Autonomi
which also means it’s a way of introducing the many existing cloud users to Autonomi
Tbh, I think the impact of autonomi 2.0 is too early to call. If it is another adventure to the land of hope and unknowns, it may have the opposite effect. If 2.0 is additive in a good way, it could be great though.
It will be interesting to see what their plan is for the tokens that were being used for emissions. Are they going to use them to give to app developers? Maybe more IF type contests? Or a token burn? Also wondering what the price will do when there is no longer a constant drip of new tokens from emissions being sold.
Would the team be open to having one of our engineers help out with libp2p releases on a regular basis? We’re happy to coordinate on process, follow any required guidelines, and help reduce the burden on your side—especially if resourcing is the main bottleneck.
The slow release cadence isn’t due to a lack of manpower, but more due to lack of demand for more frequent releases, we take the opportunity to batch as many features and breaking changes as possible into each one. In the past, users have expressed concerns about too many frequent breaking changes, which led them to stick with older versions.
Whenever users ask us for releases we take that into consideration and try to do it faster, sometimes by releasing the inner dependency so that the users can use the features without us needing to bump the main libp2p.
Hey @jxs , would it be possible to do a new release of libp2p with these new changes? These changes are required for a feature inside the Autonomi Project that I’m working on. Thank you!
And then: nothing so far, no release, not even a comment.
But I have my skepticism around having so much done with AI by a single person. Functionally, the new solutions might be great, but how about: security, debugging, general maintainability, teamworking etc?
I think, and I might very well be wrong, that the network could have followed the old / current path, but the new path might be just as good or even better. But no path is going to lead to the end of the route, if it is not followed to the end.
I see this as a buy the rumors, sell the news opportunity, and a chance to get rid of large part of my holdings with a much better price than now. Never gonna sell them all anyway, as there is a chance that eventually this thing will fly.
It tunrs out my 18 695.55 emaid were send from bitmart to the below address, not the one above i.e. the only one that is currently showing in my wallet and therefore empty. .
0x77ED5B3A8879D8727956Acd3802aa16181835008
The bizare thing is, I could see these tokens for a around one year in the same wallet but now they’ve vanished and an (apparently) unrealted (and empty) public address is now showing,
I’m sure I’ve been scammed, and Rusty tried his best to help, but just one final check to see whether anyone has any idea?
And no, I don;t have an additional seed phrase, just one that I have used all along.
You don’t have permissions from the address to strange smart contracts so there are 2 main options:
you installed some application that stole your wallet key. Review your browser history from 21 days ago what sites you visited and what you installed then.
Or someone physically had access to your computer on that date, remember if you had guests then…
This sort of thing seems most likely. There are any number of fake wallets out there. Also there are other browser extensions that may be able to view or detect what you are doing.
IMO, have a clean secure browser just for trading with no other extensions installed (just the wallet extension) and always insure you have a verified wallet (assuming you use a browser wallet at all).
I hope that most of you use a hardware wallet for most of your holdings and only use small amounts for digital wallets like MetaMask or trustwallet. Kee your funds safe.
(and I am guessing maybe don’t want to either)
