Amazing. Larken Rose wrote a book How to Be a Successful Tyrant back in 2005.
He’s just recorded a video of himself reading aloud a part of the book.
Just listen …
2 Likes
It’s funny …
1 Like
1 Like
Interesting. Hypnotic voice. Funny fact: that fireplace scene that was playing in the background? That same video is available on Tesla’s in-car display. It’s called Romance Mode. It’s right next to the Whoopee Cushion (Fart Mode).
1 Like
You should listen to this guys take on science. He is a POE, doesn’t believe what he says but buys into all the conspiracy theories to get views.
He is so unintentionally funny
I’ve never heard him once push a conspiracy theory. He’s highly critical of Atomism or the idea the world is made of particles. He’s coming at it from Field Theory. He’s a trip for sure. 
His videos on platonic logic are fascinating. He’s a translator by trade. I have a hard time with his sarcasm but I wade through it. The 4th edition of his book on magnetism will be finished soon check it out. It’s free. Who knew there was a qualitative difference between the North and South pole of a magnet. They are not the same and have dramatic effects on living things like seeds and animals. The South pole will stimulate seed grow and increase the number of sprouted seeds. The North will reduce the number sprouted and vitality of seeds in its field. This is something I learned from Ken.
He’s critical of Science as an Institution. He tries to get Folk to remember Science is a tool and nothing more.
Have you even notice the craters on the moon are not glancing hits? Most are dead on hits. Where are all the hits that were not dead on. We should see craters with changing shapes based on the angle of impact. These are likely not impact craters but craters created by plasma discharge.
New scientific reports are once again forcing planetary scientists to rewrite the history of our own moon. A new study into the lunar surface contradicts the notion that cratering on the moon occurs incrementally over vast eons of time. A team of scientists studied several thousands of before and after images of the moons’ surface, with the visual data covering nearly a million square miles. What they found is that lunar cratering appears to occur at a rate more than 100 times faster than the standard impact model has predicted. Could electrical processes on the moon be responsible for the cratering?
Here listen to a breakdown and the tricks he uses to hook people into his videos. He is a POE, he doesn’t even believe his own videos. IE he is a scammer
But this is just an example of his science being debunked and the explanation of why
The tubes are full of people playing their audiences as a fiddle to get “famous” or Rich or just troll. And this guy is one of them.
4 Likes
They take his points out of context. They don’t try to understand what he’s trying to explain. They sound are as arrogant is he is. LOL 
They sound they they think they know more than he does! The are all equally as pompous.
Ah I’ve come across this one before. It’s because the kinetic energy released when the meteorite explodes is many times greater than the simple impact energy and it throws dirt and rocks in all directions. Effectively a meteor is a bomb, and you see the same thing with bomb craters, unless the strike angle is extremely oblique.
1 Like
Then in my opinion you have been suck in by this scammer too.
They appear arrogant since the guy is a known scammer and easy to debunk. Yes the guy can appear arrogant but in this case it would be deserved since that was the guy’s area of many years of research.
If you cannot see his scam then it’ll be hard for you to see other scams
For example more exposing his scamming and lies.
Exposing the man the scammer
She summarizes in the last ten minutes Steinmetz and the Principle of Incommensurability. This will link will play the final 10 minutes of her review. Notice how she uses the term to break down the differences between the dielectric and magnetic fields on a conductor. They by their nature are incommensurable when looked at on a conductor or magnet. This what Ken was talking about. On a magnet we have two fields the magnetic and dielectric. Each requires the other to exist. Please note how she’s not sarcastic and dives into the incommensurability of these two fields. The dudes in that video make fun of the term missing the whole point Ken was making about Steinmetz and the nature of these two fields.
There are no charged particles on conductors as Steinmetz states on page 13 of his book.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332886426_Steinmetz_Analogy_Between_Magnetic_and_Dielectric
I immediately stopped reading your post after reading that sentence.
Brownian motion. Someone won a Nobel prize for that.
If you have some sense, you should add that guy to the list of flat earthers, moon landing deniers and antivaxxers.
edit: I just watched the video, I can’t believe people are falling for his technobabble. Anyone who had basic physics classes in high school should be able to tell that he is making shit up.
The fact that people are failing to realize that this guy is a moron is a symptom of the state of the educational system, and this is very concerning.
Btw, he clearly has a very cursory understanding about any subject he touches, and then he stitches some personal armchair hypotheses and presents them as facts.
For anyone who wants to really have a good footing in science, you should really study physics and epistemology. You should get:
- “University Physics” by Young and Freedman.
- “The Feynman Lectures On Physics”
And before delving into epistemology or the philosophy of science, you should have a more solid foundation in philosophy.
For those who never touched the subject, I recommend starting by reading “Sophie’s World” by Jostein Gaarder to have a very digestible overview of the whole field.
Lastly, you should know that it is a huge red flag if anyone is using philosophical arguments to “disprove” a scientific fact… especially if it is a theory that has been repeatedly proven correct experimentally, matched all the predictions and even exploited commercially in technologies.
If someone is citing Plato to criticize a scientific theory your gut reaction should be: this is ridiculous. That is like citing Franz Gall to criticize neuroscience.
9 Likes
Is there a Finland native 
speaker among us? I need an answer… Why the hen is escaping and returning?
Those people are just being silly. The hen obviously has a secret nest and wants youngins. You can usually also tell by how the hen ruffles her feathers and makes herself big while out to eat and clean herself, which these stupid people won’t let her do in peace. It usually takes around 21 days, after which the hen will come back with the chicks.
4 Likes
In this video, at 1:41-1:52, you can see the sun reflecting off the window of my cabin as the fisherman Peter drives past on his way out to sea.
5 Likes
Beautiful country!!
3 Likes
It is pretty. That it is. And cold. And humid. And windy. But it sure is pretty.
6 Likes
Are these the Aland islands? I like the idea of pumping air into the frame to raise the net - cool.
3 Likes
No. This is Pellinge (Swe.). The archipelago is called Pellinki in Finnish, but all the locals here speak Swedish. Åland is a few hundred nautical miles to the west.
3 Likes