Good luck creating an app that does what you actually want using English.
It will definitely create an app, but what it does, whether it has spyware in it or not is all unknowable and I think you are making some wild solutions about a black box you don’t understand and are trusting to do what you believe it can and will do. Based on what?
Hence my point about compilers etc. I’ve good reason to trust those tools, much less to trust any LLM, let alone ones built by the usual suspects.
The the way, if I say I or you that’s what I mean. Be helpful if you would show when you are generalising rather than appearing to be particular.
Based on the presumption that there will still be people reading the code of apps created by the black box.
Over time trust will increase or decrease.
Who will be doing that? And why? And how will that translate into being able to trust code that you generate independently? And don’t forget, this code is generated by a machine which has no understanding, by a completion based approach where small changes in the input can dramatically change the generated code. I wouldn’t read that stuff if you paid me - reviewing even good code is a poorely understood arduous and time consuming activity - and if you need people to do that I suspect it would be better pay them to write it instead.
These boxes are not compilers so their output is stochastic, and based on an imprecise input language that is generated subjectively based on little experience or understanding.
I’m going to stop now. It gets tedious and is evidently pointless.
Interesting, important and timely thread .
I see personal App Suites as becoming the new personal computer. Built from your actual life. By you. For you. Owned by you. Readable only by you. Quantum-secured. Permanent. Yours.
A genuine relationship with technology.
Not surveillance,not addiction, not extraction.
Partnership.
Cheers.