The difference with Autonomi - explained

Related Projects
1

In the Autonomi whitepaper there is a nice overview of comparable projects. This is great to communicate the advantages and disadvantages, and might result in communicating the the unique value proposition of Autonomi within this landscape of decentralized storage solutions.

However, the current overview doesn’t explain what each category means, why it is important and why a project does or doesn’t meet the requirements to qualify for a certain category. For example: why isn’t FileCoin autonomous?

Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 13.46.22
Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 13.46.221297×649 64.3 KB

Therefore I started an initiative to work on this in more detail and I was hoping to make this a community effort.

Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 16.56.52
Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 16.56.521519×671 113 KB

The more nuanced and fair we are to other technologies the more convincing this is as well. Therefore I was thinking about adding additional categories such as network performance, speed of development, etc?

This is the public link: Autonomi Decentralized Storage Comparisons - Google Sheets

6 Likes
2

and there is www.walrus.xyz comming

1 Like
3

Fabulous. Thanks for doing this.

1 Like
4

Thanks for sharing. Looking into it and it is definitely something to add to the comparison.

5

Lol so walrus have everything? Never heard about that

6

I think the default (in the sheet) is yes, and the specifics haven’t been determined yet. So no it doesn’t have everything.

7

How about a category “Quantum resistance” or “Quantum hardening”?

1 Like
8

Yeah, good one.

And indeed the standard was “Yes”, I’ve added a category unknown. To indicate if it’s unclear and still needs to be researched.

1 Like