It’s based on the idea to let sharing behavior emerge in feedback loops between consumers and producers, in self-organizing emergent networks. Here’s an old concept from an old prototype, http://graph.basicincome.co
You’ll search for companies that are connected to ecosystems with high dividends, and your own unique network will emerge from your own unique financial transactions and life-style, allowing you to live and evolve as a mobile and global citizen.
The system is based on a free market where entities put themselves and their dividend-rate on display, and where consumers select entities that provide high streams of dividends.
The project is still in early development, join http://slack.bitnation.co to connect with parts of the community. There’s also a dev-slack but it’s less public, give a shout if you want to join it.
The Resilience protocol doesn’t need your residence address, it just needs your financial address, like a bitcoin address or some other bank-account address. Not sure if that’s what you’re talking about.
Resilience was pitched to Bitnation as a system that
It’s very pro-nomadic life in that sense. Completely non-geographical and non-territorial, p2p, distributed, decentralized. It’s originally based on Ryan Fugger’s Ripple and money is concieved as trust, dividends as a form of unconditional trust, shared with fellow human beings that co-create economies. Look at Resilience protocol
@janitor and @blindsite2k please try harder not to go off-topic. Several long posts just concerning your views on nomadic etc would be fine if you’d replied to a new topic, but now clutter up this thread.
Well I think the whole issue was based on the misunderstanding that one would have to give up their physical address rather than simply a financial address like a bitcoin address. And I believe my original question was, and still is, could this system be somehow adapted for SAFE? That is could it be adapted for use on a system without a blockchain?
Okay I gave that a read over and it makes little to no sense.
They really started losing me around here.
"Whenever A sends X amount of currency (ETH) to B, B pays the rate
defined by their lowest taxeme (% of X), and then X volume of B’s lowest
taxeme is passed to A.
Volume of a taxeme is passed by subtracting it from the sender’s copy
of the taxeme and adding it to the receiver’s copy of the taxeme
(creating a new copy when one does not already exist as issued by the
same person at the same rate).
If B’s lowest taxeme was issued by A, then instead of passing volume on to A, the volume that would be passed is deleted."
And no writing the whole thing in programming code does not help.
No need for technological projects, when a country has it’s citizens best interests as it’s priority:
The Finnish government is currently drawing up plans to introduce a national basic income. A final proposal won’t be presented until November 2016, but if all goes to schedule, Finland will scrap all existing benefits and instead hand out 800 euros per month—to everyone