Good question.
On one hand, funding may not be needed. If community devs work together & other community members chip in on marketing etc, if we can organise ourselves with some focus on delivering specific high-impact experiences, it may be able to happen organically. It may be that after doing a proof-of-concept torrent solution, the Webtorrent team / another torrent client team is interested in adding it without needing a new torrent client at all.
If funding is needed, one challenge with finding Autonomi based apps is that the benefit of any successful app goes to all ANT holders, not a new token where value is captured only by the investors in that project.
On the plus side of this, it means all ANT holders should be interested in finding development of anything that has a serious chance of rising the tide for demand for using Autonomi, boosting awareness, and therefore increasing demand for ANT.
If there were e.g. 3 projects outlined by the community that have clear utility and solve problems for existing audiences/markets that, if addressed well, would provide significant demand for ANT, the community could fund a 6 month sprint to deliver solutions for them along with marketing focus for each.
If this cost e.g. $250k, but yielded 3 fantastic products with real world utility for an existing audience + marketing resources for them, it could be more than worth it for ANT holders in terms of boosting token demand & awareness (network tangibility would be almost guaranteed).
I think the torrent client is 1 concept with potential; it solves a real problem for an existing audience, and BTT shows the kind of value if could have.
Itās a new value-adding feature for an existing product & market, not a new product that needs to find a market.
Hopefully we can find more ideas for Autonomi value-adding offerings that can āslip inā to existing markets / userbases vs requiring the growth of a new userbase to find success. Then letās try to figure out how to move them forward, with community funding if needed.