What’s up today? (Part 2)

“We need to deploy the new variant” ← Was the man high when writing this? Who would phrase in this way.

2 Likes

Just shows he’s a callous sociopath. No surprise - government power attracts them like sh!t does flies.

2 Likes

Telegraph or Mail - two cheeks of the same shitey arse.

And the Tories are utter scum - as if any confirmation was needed.
Every single one of them and all who would even consider voting for them.

1 Like

Okay how about the Guardian?

Here Hancock is PO’d that they messages were leaked … doesn’t deny anything.

Edit: also in the Sun

People are people - bad one’s in every group. If the groups are composed of politicians then the ration of bad to good goes through the roof. If you think it’s just one group - one side that’s good, then you’ve been bamboozled by the divide and conquer strategy they employ.

2 Likes

Dr. Campbell on the messages.

1 Like

Ah the Grauniad - beloved of the middle-class wannabe liberals - owned and very carefully editorialised by the same tribe that controls the rest but with added faux lefty credentials from a time long long ago. Once a haven of good journalism, the rot set in when it ceased to be the Manchester Guardian and moved south to conform.

The Guardian is a comfort blanket for the middle-class who just cannot bear to admit they are middle-class and think they are somehow “progressive”, “liberal”, “tolerant” when in actuality they are none of these things.
Suitable prop to be seen reading whilst enjoying a sustainably-traded cappuchino in the trendiest of vegan cafes.

Sqme shit- different presentation with added pretentiousness.

Hancock is still a wanker,

2 Likes

I completely agree! Trump is a divisive egotisical blowhard. A good leader brings people together. Trump divides his own party and the nation in general. He uses the immigration crisis as political football while never really doing anything about it.

2 Likes

My problem is not if it’s true but why it’s all coming out now. What’s the motive or what are they trying to hide. If I were to hazard a guess I would say it’s to make the upcoming International Health Regulations changes seem more appealing. If people don’t know what these changes are I’d suggest taking a look :face_vomiting:

yeap ESG is the new name that will enslave all

For years, the Department of Homeland Security has run a virtually unknown program gathering domestic intelligence, one of many revelations in a wide-ranging tranche of internal documents reviewed by POLITICO.

Those documents also reveal that a significant number of employees in DHS’s intelligence office have raised concerns that the work they are doing could be illegal.

Why is this insurrectionist thanking the police for allowing him into the building? Why is he walking past officers and not being arrested? If he was being arrested these are the politest American officers I have seen :joy:

1 Like

Nigerians’ Reject Central Bankster’s CBDC

The world is ripe for a currency that really works for the people - and not the banksters.

5 Likes

A lot of things were happening on Jan. 6 and there was a lack of organization and leadership of law enforcement on the ground, not to mention that they were greatly outnumbered. Why didn’t they just fire their weapons? The answer to that should be obvious. What about tear gas, why didn’t they use that? It was used, but not in an effective way. Why were some cops escorting insurrectionists into the building? Some of it was because they wanted to avoid bloodshed, some of it was because a few of the 300-400 law enforcement personnel were Trump sympathizers. Logic says there would be some.

2 Likes

Why do you think the footage was withheld from the public? Should that man be in jail for 4 years if he was let in by police officers?

2 Likes

Maybe you should ask the two police officers what was going on.

1 Like

“The investigation into the January 6 attack remains under investigation. Our Office of Professional Responsibility is investigating the actions of 35 police officers from that day. We currently have suspended six of those officers with pay,” the department said in a statement."

Since Trump got almost half the votes in the Presidential election, it should come as no surprise that about 10% of officers on duty that day might have been part of his support.

1 Like

It’s not a crime to have a personal opinion @VaCrunch. I don’t think they should have withheld the footage and I don’t that man should be in jail for a 4 years based on the new footage. What do you think?

2 Likes

I think you shouldn’t base any opinion on a video without hearing what the subjects have to say about the video. Videos can be misleading, and erroneous conclusions drawn from them. Not saying that is what’s happening here, just saying information is incomplete.

2 Likes

Isn’t it at least possible that the committee withheld the video specifically because it was misleading?

1 Like

“I have no excuse,” Chansley said. “No excuses whatsoever. My behavior is indefensible.”

2 Likes