The only strings these kids are pulling is Victoria’s Secret…
Just my string theory 
err its Victor’s Secret…
Which doesn’t always works out OK either if provided by public authorities:
General Motors shutting off Flint River water at engine plant over corrosion worries - mlive.com
Chloride levels in treated Flint River water are so high that General Motors will no longer use it at its engine plant here because of fears it will cause corrosion. The city began using the Flint River as its source of public water in April, ending five decades of buying pre-treated Lake Huron water from the city of Detroit.
30 000 000 россиян используют вместо туалетов выгребные ямы:
I dont speak Russian… Something about 30 million of them?
If anyone was going to make an arse of public water supplies it would be the Yanks - fear of “sewer socialism” perhaps or did the right people not get the correct bung?
Which is a pity cos this is an excellent channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMOqf8ab-42UUQIdVoKwjlQ - nobody can accuse them of not knowing the right thing to do - its whether there is enough in it for the parasite 1% or the deluded 10% petty bourgois shit that support them - scared shitless of being accused as “anti-semitic”
Look at the answer you have just given to “simplistic trivia”. Very informative and thought provoking . By having discussions arising from simple questions maybe more complex questions can be asked and answers found. More common ground could be found rather than continuing division. Groundbreaking ideas can come from one simple question being discussed.
That’s a hell of an acrobatic move you have there. There probably very little you can’t justify if you accept that as reasonable.
Would you explain the acrobatics you believe I have performed? Just for future reference what is the academic level of question you are willing to lower yourself to participate in discussion?
You claim that because I took the trouble to illustrate why I regard such a simplistic take to be useless, it somehow justifies such simplistic takes.
Not everyone has the ability to comprehend more than a simplistic take and that’s why I believe it’s a good place to start. Then the conversation can evolve and hopefully the people involved may learn something they never knew before.
Lucky you.
Do you disagree with that statement or are you just trying to make out like I am some sort of arrogant person to score some virtue signalling points?
You are so insightful! . . . and inciteful now that I think about it.
Once again no participation or contribution to the discussion 
by the way I have never been in Washington on January 6th of any year 
All in good fun my man. Just tryin’ to mix in some mirth in the metaphysical musings.
I too was not in Washington on the 6th, but I did pass by a couple of days earlier on my way to visit a pal in Sunderland if it helps?
Very fine pint from the old Vaux brewery BTW
Stay on topic please.
Telegram certainly isn’t that good at privacy as some might believe:
Why would anyone think telegram is secure? The most secure coms are the ones that are never mentioned in articles by corporate media - coincidence? I think not.
The fact that telegram get’s so much attention is itself reason to suspect it. The fact that it’s not peer to peer is another.
Also if you think the Kremlin is the only gov. tapping into the backend, think again.
The one from the article thought it was safe apparently (at least in the past). I personally didn’t think or say that, nor that Russia would be the only government ‘tapping into the backend’. Despite of that, IMHO still an interesting article with a lot of details.