Hex was made to enrich one guy, i know you think he will do good with the money and create a better world, but ultimately he gains the most. If your correct thats great, but money can corrupt, especially when you have no one to answer to.
I dont believe that was the case with yams at all.
Saying hex gives you hex and yams give you yams is an over simplistic views.
Humans give you humans, but they are not a hex copy.
A post on the topic yesterday said the project brings “mashes up” some of the most exciting innovations in programmable money and governance — referring to it taking the best (or worst) of Compound, Yearn.Finance, and Ampleforth.
This would be an epic gorilla marketing move, especially if we did it world wide!
Another idea that would be next level (but probably extremely time consuming and hard to coordinate) would be a SAFE specific international puzzle much like ‘Cicada’. If you haven’t heard of that, look it up on YouTube.
There actually may have been an idea like this already now that I think about it. SAFE Bomb? @goindeep do you remember? It was some idea of a puzzle box of sorts with Safecoin locked inside. Was a neat idea.
I think it matters to Buffett, so that he at least is / appears to be consistent with what he has said in the past about gold.
Edit: I just found it odd that Buffet would have bought physical gold (or ETF), because I did know his (past) opinion about gold. And after looking it up, he indeed didn’t buy that, but gold mine shares. I’m not saying if he is (in)correct with that opinion.