sorry to say, I quite hate they focus too much on use case, loads of features but not on the basic design. The whole project should avoid data lost, basic important things, and now blaming some operators doing these things. Just like bitcoin, a perfect framework, developers can build things on top so it grows. Why always so many upgrades to fix the issues that you made but not think twice to fix all these issues before product launches!? Meaning the whole thing is not solid. And still more you havenāt think about it. I am not FUD, but they really should change their mindset. Autonomi team should not focus on those fancy features!
If you are the investor, you must saying the same. The basic thing is not done yet. Whereās the value here?
I just want to be clear, we arenāt blaming node operators.
It is a fact that the mass resets are very harmful for the network, but we recognise that large operators didnāt have much alternative for doing upgrades, hence why we are now working on automatic upgrades.
We donāt have perfect foresight, and furthermore we just wouldnāt have encountered a lot of these crucial issues if we hadnāt launched.
So you knowing mass reset is an issue, is that what you can foresee? Seriously? How about UK blackout. No plan at all? Just think about what you are telling me is you are already foreseeing something but not doing something until those things explode.
This is facts
Plus, those updates are fixing not enhancing, of course big operators not doing freq update. For you, are you willing to do continue fixing bugs, or working? Of course no one like working. As simple as that. Those are not benefits to node operators! But these are the things you made. I do think if you guys canāt foresee some issues, not to push those things in hurry, but think twice.
Like many other issues, itās been on the cards for a while, but as a small team we have very finite resources and we need to decide what to prioritise. We canāt wait until everything is perfect before we launch. If we took that approach weād never get any products out there at all.
Thatās false. Thereās been lots of enhancements in our releases.
for node operators, what they want? Do those enhancements really benefits them? Or for your network stability? What those enhancements are for your own good.
Does those earn more? No!
So those are fixing your things. It is fact. Itās just a critical thinking. No matter how you spinning off. What investor want? Want node operator want? For what I see, now those are what you guys want.
Seriously, where is the benefitā:joy: why people here always asking for more use cases, more features all about profit! More valuable token!
Why some people delete those chunks, earning more. As simple as this. I do compile my own version of code, I know what you guys writing. So honestly, not really rewarding but punishing. If you donāt follow my updates just F off, not even having a single token from me. I donāt have fancy words. But everyone must try to gain somewhat advantage, low power consumption, running more nodes than other, finding the loop holes in it. Like Bitcoin, GPU , FPGA, ASIC
A better and more successful network through imporvements = higher Autonomi ANT price, that would also benefit node operators. Also node operators shall work for what is best for the network and the future success of the network and price of Autonomi ANTās.
not =, is afterwards and not sure how long. This is what people see. And assuming no people selling. If it is what you said, already no one selling it, price wonāt drop like this , fact!
and then you said work for the network, why? Profit! They donāt care stability, if ant token worth like bitcoin, as a miner, do you care its stability? Again, those are what you guys want.
Yes many people want to make profit and that is understandable. Nothing wrong with wanting to be rewarded for your work. But if you are a large operator you should care about stability and reliability of the network. Wouldnāt you like to be able to make profit for many years to come?
If you are saying that profit is needed for node runners to keep the network alive and that this profit is more important than stability - then 100% I agree. Stability is important, but it is secondary.
Why? Because itās simple logic isnāt it ā¦ if there are no node runners, then there is no network and if the latter, then stability is irrelevant.
My suggestion has been for some time, that the management needs to work on marketing through influencers to attract long term investors and boost the token value, giving node runners more profit. I hope they consider this in the future.
You didnāt hear the best part, often the childish behavior comes from new accounts, because most likely some of the people here do these things and are worried about being banned if they swear from their main account.
so you know mass reset is an issue, you are encouraging it to come
Force upgrade, no backward compatibility
If I were the large operator, I do mirror image flashing and start running those nodes in maximum 2 hours like 1k nodes 100 boards rather than upgrading it 60000 intervals
Data lose
Dead end. Great to hear that. Thatās all my stuff junk again
Actually they are doing opposite bringing the value down rather than up. So called value, for who? Sounds appealing to ant clients, never node operators.
E.g. bitcoin (everyone should knows)
Transaction fees low? No, even the highest
Transaction speed high? No, even the slowest
What is the lowest transaction fee? Shit coin!
Right? So transaction fees service fees really second after you have value.
Ā£7/GB per month on aws, if you have the top security, solid one, Ā£20/GB lifetime is cheap enough, isnāt it? If I am the investor, what I want to hear is not your fancy features, is you can earn more.
Iāve read all your post and Iām still a little unclear as to what youāre asking!
If youāre concern is earning more as a node operator then you should be welcoming dramatically lower transaction fees to get data on the network because data storage is what you are supplying and this is what you should be rewarded for.
Node operators, if they share that concern, should also be welcoming any work that improves the on boarding of that data to the network and itās ongoing accessibility, usability, and security.
Two people in short succession has said that they donāt understand what you are trying to say, and your response, instead of clarification is more of the same arbitrary replies.
for node operators, what they want? Do those enhancements really benefits them? Or for your network stability? What those enhancements are for your own good.
all about profit! More valuable token!
