I reckon there’s some inspiration to be had within this site for Safe architects…some heavy calculus stuff along with the science 
takedowns.
For every real ε > 0, there exists a real δ > 0 such that for all real x, 0 < | x − p | < δ implies that | f(x)
− L | < ε.
Excerpts from the recent article http://milesmathis.com/bell3.pdf
But once you are reminded that the charge field is real, ubiquitous, and always
local, all the mystery evaporates. Information isn’t being carried across empty space, since there is no
such thing as empty space.As I have shown, this also explains tunneling, faster than light communication, and all other mysteries
of QM. The speed of transmission only seems infinite because it is not understood that the charge field was already there before the switch was flipped.
Flipping an electrical switch doesn’t create a charge field, it simply uses it. The scientists just don’t understand the endpoint was already receiving information via the charge field before they sent it, so they mistakenly think it is infinitely fast.
It isn’t infinitely fast, it was just there before they began measuring it. Almost all the mysteries of QM and QED are explained in that way
The charge field is THE fundamental field of the universe, and yet they ignore it in this whole question as if it isn’t there. They deny that any hidden variable could explain the spooky nature of entanglement, but that is true only in the case we are dealing with a hidden variable, or more than one.
This is because a hidden variable would—by definition—apply to one particle or the other, or both.
Therefore, its expression would be necessarily local and limited, seeming to offer no solution. But if
what we are dealing with here is not a hidden variable, or even a set of them, but a hidden field, then
the whole landscape changes.
Obviously, a hidden universal field, of no limit in time or extension, would explain
entanglement immediately, with a flip of a switch. And that is exactly what we have. We have a real
pre-existing charge field that exists everywhere and is prior to any EM field created. Given that, all
spookiness or magic dissolves.The cui bono in the case of Giustina is obvious, since she went from this Vienna experiment directly to
Google in 2016, where she joined their Quantum AI Lab, developing quantum computers. This too is a
fraud, since I have proved there is no such thing as a quantum computer. It is yet another fraud upon the American taxpayer, who are paying millions to develop something that cannot possibly exist.
These computers are based on manipulation not only of these false QM ideas like entanglement,
superposition, and tunneling, they are based on fake “virtual” objects like cubits, and on illegal and
fanciful ideas like borrowing from the vacuum. The only way computers can get any better is by better
use of the charge field, and that will never happen as long as quantum mechanics remains mired in this pit of corruption.