Ah ok, got you now, thanks.
2 Likes
Just to be sure: a list that contains the license of the logo? The logo itself can already be downloaded from the âpress kitâ-page.
1 Like
Yes, weâll get that added to the site 
4 Likes
Seems like a failsafe way to get it on the page would be to first upload the black and blue variants to Wikimedia Commons with all the licensing info mentioned there. Then the Wikipedia page could just link to the Wikimedia commons image.
4 Likes
Yes, but better to wait until the license is mentioned on the safenetworktech site.
3 Likes
I translated the article into the Czech language. Do the same with your native language. Editing wikipedia is simple.
16 Likes
Editing is simple, but preventing your changes to be reverted by someone else is a bit more difficult 
7 Likes
Just a tip with regard to the Wikipedia article!
If you click the âView historyâ tab and then from the âExternal toolsâ menu line you choose the âPageviewsâ tab, you will be able to keep tabs on how many views this article has.
As we can see by now, it had a high of just above 200 views on the day after it was created (Dec. 8/9) and about 35 views on Dec. 20.
It shall be fun watching the graphs soar!
11 Likes
Someone translated to Nederlands. @anon40790172 perhaps??
7 Likes
I did. I liked the idea of @Quetzalcoatl so decided to translate it! My first contribution to Wikipedia, seems like other contributors fixed quite some errors and syntax. Also very unnatural Dutch formulations, but itâs something.
14 Likes
An editor that goes by âWbraspâ had tried to edit the logo on the SAFE Network Wikipedia page and wasnât following Wikipedia guidelines (apparently) and now there is a âUDP Tagâ (UnDisclosed Payment) on the page. So Wbrasp created an account to strictly edit the SAFE Network page which is very bad in the eyes of moderators! They assume someone was payed to do so 
. If you know Wbrasp by chance please politely ask them to stop, earn a reputation as per Wikipediaâs suggestions, and someday contribute.
Since the page is so new it seems that having novice editing is a bit of a trigger for Wikipedia so letâs be careful folks and play the long game and do it right!
11 Likes
You certainly have to watch out and it would be better if someone with more Wiki cred adds the logo again with the correct license to the SAFE Network page. Btw @nicklambert have you already an idea when the logo with the correct license will be added to safenetwork.tech?
But if I understand it correctly it is AnomieBOT who added the âUDP Tagâ⊠And also another bot who removed the logo from the site.
That reminds me of the system âbotâ on this forum which can be too strict at times.
Have you a link to the exact reasoning/logic of AnomieBOT for adding the âUDP Tagâ?
I hope the OTRS system of Wikimedia isnât needed for the logo license to be checked: delay of 204 days atmâŠ
It seems Wikipedia is seriously understaffed.
That âdoing it rightâ doesnât alwyas seem that simple. Also a novice editor has to start somewhere, and making minor changes is part of earning a reputation I think: Wikipedia:Be bold - Wikipedia.
8 Likes
Yes absolutely is. The biggest issue is a novice only editing the SAFE page. Thatâs not who Wikipedia is trying to attract. They want specialized editors but not that specialized and not biased.
The page is new enough it also has no protections, so if people are too reckless then the whole page could be taken down.
2 Likes
Chasing this up now, it should have been done but unfortunately hasnât been, apologies for the delay.
3 Likes
Woah WTF.
It says itâs been deleted.
1 Like
SAFEnetwork absolutely deserves to have a Wikipedia page. What the hell!!!
1 Like
this is the second time they delete the page, I remember that in 2014-2015 I translated it into Bulgarian and they deleted itâŠ
3 Likes
Seems to me we need a few of the major devs to make the wiki page. Get it straight from the horseâs mouth so to speak. Or maybe get PR on it directly. Seems a major marketing and communications point and wikipedia seems to be a bit of a collective drama queen so perhaps we need to get our info together and avoid offending their sensitive egos. Tho Iâd vote for a less drama inducing SAFE-pedia.
2 Likes
Bias is frowned upon by Wikipedia but if you are transparent with your conflict of interest then you can request a page be created. Iâm doing a lot of reading and hoping this can get resolved somehow soon.
10 Likes
Lets fix it.
- 22:50, 28 December 2018 Yunshui (talk | contribs) deleted page SAFE Network (G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban)
There is a draft for this article at Draft:SAFE Network.
Only got deleted for a rule violation. Blocked or banner user created it. Thereâs a draft article just get any new user to RE upload it.
I have no clue what Iâm doing with wiki but will try give it a crack if no one else can.
2 Likes