Hey, Louis / @JohnVonNeumann there’s a very useful little job for a Ruby Dev, to update SAFE-VFS to work in the new API. @anon71598723 hasn’t time to update it, but it would be fantastic to have this ready for alpha2 if you want to take a look at these two posts:
I’m afraid I have form here, trying to interest somebody in picking up SAFE-VFS but here’s why, this blew my mind:
Haha hey @happybeing, cheers for the tag. It appears I’m quickly being accepted into this community. I’m happy to have a look but haven’t worked with Ruby in a while and to be fair, it’s not my focus when it comes to languages. If it was in Python you’d probably stand a better chance of getting me onto this, but I think it would take me a while to get upto scratch just to start being able to work on it.
Finding this thread was like getting an early Christmas present. I’ve been doing my homework looking at what already exists after I started thinking about trying to implement something similar via python. Great work @anon71598723 ! From a linux perspective, this is a fundamental and critical app. Any other fuse based options out there for SAFE? Eventually one would want some kind of safe-vfs or “safe-ipfs” integrated right into the linux kernel just like ext4 or orangefs…
A similar project that could be used for inspiration is S3Backer. It does something similar but uses Amazon S3 to store encrypted chunks…
It’s such a shame that safe-vfs hasn’t been maintained (it doesn’t work with alpha 2) because yes, it’s both very useful, and a great way to demonstrate the power of SAFEnetwork.
Is a great opportunity for someone to pick this up - Ruby skills needed!
Very nice! Thank you again! I haven’t had much time to make a lot of progress with Safely, but your recent contributions will definitely accelerate things when I have more time in July. I was debating between MIT or GPL3, but will likely follow your lead. Cheers!