Let me guess, with a “good dev team” you mean a team that 1) immediately starts a bitcointalk thread to hype the coin even though the project is tethered 100% to SAFE and that community’s headquarters is here and 2) has an intimate knowledge of the policies of crypto-exchanges to know exactly where to go for maximum short term profit? Because that’s what your complaints in this thread have been about.
Then again, you are looking “for a successfull coin”, while I am aiming for a successfull product of which the coin is one of several parts. No wonder our priorities are not aligned. Glad you made a little profit though, I wish you luck.
yes you are right, i am just an short term investor looking for profit and i am not interested in the product behind or SAFE. that’s altcoin reality! hyping and marketing is way more important, look at lisk. we are all here to make money, are we. good luck
yeah, everyone were hurry and wanted bittrex, that’s what happens when coins hit bittrex, iv been warning about that. now it’s a good time to buy some at these prices, and keep voting for poloniex to add it. volume is great, i see no reason for PDC not going for bigger exchanges
i think you will look back on this in a few years and wince at the thought of how much they would have been worth if you’d held them, but then I’m biased, I bought a lot and I hold precisely because Harmen is exactly the kind of dev who gets the job done right, and the job he’s doing is important and valuable for all of us - unlike a lot of alt coins imo.
As he said, glad you made some money, nobody likes losing it, best of luck with your other investments. I’m not sure why you felt the need to show how little you really knew or understood about the project after you’d sold. Your comments look daft and misplaced to anyone who understands this project.
Bittrex is the sole reason that SEC a 50k ipo , manage to get to a 4+ million dollar valuation a few weeks after, its obviously crashed now but has never dropped below ICO price .
Being added to poloniex wouldn’t of been any better really , it is still a relatively new coin , clearly lots of people wanted to sell for some reason , would of likely been the same on poloniex , and plus getting on poloniex is like 100 times hard currently , they very strict in the adding process now, and while i think a coin rising more than 400k in an ico should be enough proof for a want and the popularity of the coin, it just isn’t a realistic prospect right now, unless we all try to spam poloniex with it which could leave them feeling megitive about the coin and decrease chances of being added.
You also have to remember this is the trading of a coin without any finished product yet, so its very speculatory , without any genuine working model being shown the interest will begin low , wait till the safenetwork is function and there is stuff people can actually see then interest will increase, not only that but exchanges outside of the safenetwork will likely have much less than any place selling it within the safenetwork once it has launched
Pmsl, you really know nothing about this project do you? One of the fundamental reasons safe is so much better than the other crypto projects is BECAUSE it uses chainless consensus, doesn’t suffer from blockchain bloat, doesn’t require confirmations and fees or wasteful things like proof-of-work. If safenetwork were just another blockchain then we wouldn’t all be here. Safenetwork is security, privacy and freedom for everyone who wants it in their digital lives. BTC and Eth lol… totally different and much less impressive projects, child’s play by comparison. I own a bit of both, but meh, SAFE is where the real disruption is about to come from.
Well said, this summarizes it nicely on a high level. Between all the FUD, (lack of) hype, short term traders that make the mistake that SAFE or Decorum are set up as get-rich-quick-schemes, … This is what it is really about. SAFE and its side projects are no less than a paradigm shift, and it might turn out a revolutionary evolution. When you think of it, not for the faint of heart.
This topic is about the Project Decorum Crowdsale. You got a link to discuss the topic about Blockchains and consensus. Stay on-topic please, thank you.
I just noticed the blue Penrose beside PDC on coinmarketcap. Is this appropriate? It’s not Maidsafe’s project.
Edit: this adds weight to the argument that the company and the network branding need to be separate. Only more confusion to come as more apps are added using the ‘network logo’.
Some, as seen have aleady turned sour. Clear distinction is important… trust in a brand the same.
Protecting the brand is just as important as the branding process itself. As soon as some negative issue arises with an org piggybacking on Maidsafe. Maidsafe, the farmers, investors, devs, et al pay the price. Maidsafe needs to set guidelines for who and how its “EXPENSIVE” branding can be used.
PDC should not be allowed to use this and Maidsafe should not give them permission.
If a logo needs to be created for complimentary technologies that are built for Maidsafe - similiar to “powered by Intel” then lets do it. But ir needs to be clear this is not Maidsafe.
