PUTs still going strong for me. No errors yet.
3 Likes
I wonder if it affects download speeds.
Do @peca have fresh data about it?
4 Likes
like @SmoothOperatorGR I have several copies of a script uploading 9Mb of random junk running in a couple of Hetzner nodes.
I have nodes in Nuremberg and Helsinki right now, I will put a couple of others up in Falkenburg and the USA. All are on min spec CX11 1vCPU 2Gb RAM and 20Gb disk. When the network starts accepting nodes I will add 50Gb volumes mounted on ~/.safe/node/
Im not convinced running several copies on one node will increase the actual amount of data written to the network - its possibly limited by outgoing bandwidth at Hetzner. Thoughts?
EDIT: Looking at the network traffic graphs for the nodes shows there IS a benefit in running the upload scripts in parallel - so now I have 10 copies running on each of 2 nodes. I will stop one to take a snapshot and clone another couple of servers from that.
2 Likes
I don’t see big difference. (Time is in UTC):
2022-12-17 08:45:28.038841 0:04:54.334310
2022-12-17 09:00:22.555594 0:04:50.462242
2022-12-17 09:15:13.212165 0:04:54.136511
2022-12-17 09:30:07.542076 0:04:53.423660
2022-12-17 09:45:01.144836 0:05:05.584408
2022-12-17 10:00:06.911841 0:04:54.193497
2022-12-17 10:15:01.196197 0:04:50.291968
2022-12-17 10:29:51.615153 0:04:50.010739
2022-12-17 10:44:41.808295 0:04:51.184804
2022-12-17 10:59:33.156056 0:04:52.427495
2022-12-17 11:14:25.771368 0:04:53.938569
2022-12-17 11:29:19.901214 0:04:49.203023
2022-12-17 11:44:09.198177 0:04:56.240606
2022-12-17 11:59:05.626524 0:04:54.475348
2022-12-17 12:14:00.207793 0:04:51.569914
2022-12-17 12:28:51.892585 0:04:57.939106
2022-12-17 12:43:50.006050 0:04:53.325803
2022-12-17 12:58:43.510252 0:04:59.164779
2022-12-17 13:13:42.860407 0:04:57.124062
2022-12-17 13:28:40.122543 0:04:50.160084
2022-12-17 13:43:30.463902 0:04:56.724751
2022-12-17 13:58:27.379113 0:04:53.741635
2022-12-17 14:13:21.291502 0:04:59.682146
2022-12-17 14:28:21.157887 0:04:48.375403
2022-12-17 14:43:09.661226 0:04:56.956401
2022-12-17 14:58:06.723398 0:04:53.648527
2022-12-17 15:13:00.512638 0:05:03.430850
2022-12-17 15:28:04.124680 0:04:55.981151
2022-12-17 15:43:00.302097 0:04:54.442290
2022-12-17 15:57:54.937380 0:05:06.141424
2022-12-17 16:13:01.266746 0:04:54.947487
2022-12-17 16:27:56.398992 0:04:55.965106
2022-12-17 16:42:52.549499 0:04:52.985478
2022-12-17 16:57:45.729560 0:05:00.153909
2022-12-17 17:12:46.074642 0:04:56.767514
2022-12-17 17:27:43.022672 0:05:07.449012
2022-12-17 17:42:50.592659 0:05:13.675844
3 Likes
Is there any word on how full the original nodes are?
Are they all behaving themselves?
Is anybody uploading anything worth downloading/capable of being verified?
There are two sides to this story, so far we seem to be doing well with the upload side.
Not me. Just random blobs at the mo
1 Like
can try any of these
safe cat safe://hy8oycypiouw8toboe4q71cadijctz64iterk8143xshc6nxupmhdzb8usc
should give you a list of my uploads from take 2
1 Like
Did you mean safe files get?
no just run it like that and it will show you a list of files and there safe link
2 Likes
Damn, I think I just saw my node joining, but got too excited and tried to copy-paste the terminal info… with CTRL+C
This is what it said:
Node PID: 18638, prefix: Prefix(), name: bba777(10111011).., age: 5, connection info:
"0.0.0.0:56300
Re-started the joining, and all I get now is the good old:
The network is not accepting nodes right now. Retrying after 30 seconds. Node log path: /home/topi/.safe/node/local-node/
Did someone else get in? Did I break it?
EDIT:
I have a chunk folder with: 1 139 items, totalling 104,2 MB. It does not seem to receive any more…
No! I am getting more, now: 1 187 items, totalling 108,5 MB
… and my memory use seems to be stable.
Hmm… I still have an ongoing join process going on, what should I do with it? Can it ruin something? If I close my terminal window, what happens? Does my node still keep going on in the background?
1 Like
Is it just me or is an army filling the network with random junk a few steps outside of scope? 
Maybe not idk, but perhaps we need more definitive guidelines for each test.
2 Likes
Just you, just you…
2 Likes
The need to join is strong 
4 Likes
Something’s off? … not finding what did exist as safe://uni2
$ safe files get safe://uni2
Error:
0: ContentNotFound: Content not found at safe://uni2
I’ve been getting:-
Failed to connect: ConnectionError: Failed to connect to the SAFE Network: NetworkContacts(“failed to make initial contact with network to bootstrap to after 3 attempts, result in last attempt: Err(NoResponse { msg_id: MsgId(2058…9a69), peers: [Peer { name: 56e8c3(01010110)…, addr: 143.110.168.239:12000 }, Peer { name: 38608b(00111000)…, addr: 142.93.38.111:35572 }, Peer { name: 1364f4(00010011)…, addr: 161.35.42.123:44021 }] })”)
for about the last 40 mins.
I was uploading 1000 1MB files sequentially and it was about 200 files through the list.
If it was me who broke I am sorry. 
4 Likes
No apologies… the way it reacts to alsorts of stresses needs to be tested… hopefully more of those will be graceful going forward.
Does look like unavaliable network, rather than my file, which I take as encouraging…
$ safe dog safe://uni2
Error:
0: Failed to connect: ConnectionError: Failed to connect to the SAFE Network: NetworkContacts("failed to make initial contact with network to bootstrap to after 3 attempts, result in last attempt: Err(NoResponse { msg_id: MsgId(98d2..ba94), peers: [Peer { name: 56e8c3(01010110).., addr: 143.110.168.239:12000 }, Peer { name: 6790a7(01100111).., addr: 206.189.19.110:36495 }, Peer { name: 1364f4(00010011).., addr: 161.35.42.123:44021 }] })")
Location:
sn_cli/src/operations/auth_and_connect.rs:83
4 Likes
#MeToo
Backtrace omitted. Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 environment variable to display it.
Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full to include source snippets.
Error:
0: Failed to connect with read-only access
1: ConnectionError: Failed to connect to the SAFE Network: NetworkContacts("failed to make initial contact with network to bootstrap to after 3 attempts, result in last attempt: Err(NoResponse { msg_id: MsgId(f8b4..fbb6), peers: [Peer { name: 38608b(00111000).., addr: 142.93.38.111:35572 }, Peer { name: a1dcf8(10100001).., addr: 104.248.167.4:43678 }, Peer { name: 56e8c3(01010110).., addr: 143.110.168.239:12000 }] })")
Killing my scripts
1 Like
It is perfectly natural reaction to hiding joins behind 50 GB wall.
1 Like
I have heard of a buy wall and a sell wall now I think you just invented the “Join wall”
5 Likes