Gaming farming rewards - cost for GETs

That’s imply section consensus for each section on the path of each GET, isn’t it?

Hmm, RFC 57: Safecoin Revised - #54 by dirvine would make more sens if there is a section wide consensus for GETs (a vault would know if an internal GET isn’t valid, the proxying vault could still do an external GET tho, and repeat if it gets the GET).

1 Like