Easter Update from Bux

I hope everyone is having a lovely weekend, and that some of you are able to enjoy a longer one with the celebration of Easter :sun:

Just wanted to share the below link with you (and a little ‘short’ displayed on Discord, the file is too large to upload here), as made a bit of time to put together a compilation, I thought some of you might enjoy. :growing_heart:

The video is made up of moments from a call I had with @dirvine this past Monday. A conversation like this is something that those who make it through into Phase 2 of Impossible Futures, will be able to have about their project and concept. A chat with David is a perfect way to strengthen your resolve and to test and stretch your thinking :flexed_biceps:

The full video, covers a huge range of very cool topics, in what I found to be a really fun and accessible way. David answers everything from what’s right (and wrong) with the blockchain, to why the native token matters (you all know this already …), to how he sees the future with AI fuelling our knowledge and desire to explore. Oh, there is also a cliff hanger and a yet unanswered question about the power of Weetabix … :scream:

Really looking forward to hearing your thoughts as to whether you’d like more of these, it was certainly a pleasure to capture this one! :folded_hands:

Sending my very best to you all and wishing a lovely Easter to those enjoying it,

@Bux

34 Likes

the power of Weetabix … :scream:

Weetanomics :sunny: :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

Wonder how many words are in the digestive on my plate? :slightly_smiling_face:

thouroughly enjoyed every minute .

11 Likes

I love David, but his accent terrifies me. I’m grateful that AI understands him though, so here’s an extract from the video. :happyant:

What’s in it for me?

Dive into the thought-provoking insights of David Irvine as he challenges prevailing beliefs about technology, decentralization, and human exploration. In a world buzzing with blockchain and AI, Irvine’s observations break down these advanced concepts into digestible reflections. He questions whether our understanding of decentralized networks and human innovation aligns with natural processes, and suggests alternative approaches might be necessary for authentic progress. Tune in for a fresh perspective that highlights the importance of curiosity and the human pursuit of understanding the unknown.

Inherent Skepticism Towards ‘Experts’

David Irvine highlights his skepticism towards self-proclaimed experts. He argues that genuine expertise should be discernible through conversation rather than self-assigned titles. Irvine believes that many philosophies and ideologies are wrapped in complex terminology, often creating barriers rather than fostering understanding. To unravel this, he advocates for simplifying discussions to core principles, ensuring clarity and practical comprehension, which he applies to topics like blockchain technology.

Blockchain’s Natural Limitations

Irvine delves into blockchain technology, emphasizing its unnatural structure compared to natural processes. While blockchain is hailed for its decentralized money transactions, it relies on a centralized data structure. He analogizes this to a hypothetical scenario where natural systems like ant colonies are required to centralize decisions, which doesn’t occur due to inefficiency. For Irvine, while blockchain serves monetary purposes, other applications need true decentralization, free from ‘unnatural’ data frameworks.

The Nature of Money and Beyond

Addressing the concept of money, Irvine finds it an unnatural creation unique to humans, like ‘time.’ He notes Bitcoin’s fit within this framework due to its centralized transactional record-keeping. However, he sees shortcomings in extending blockchain to non-monetary domains like communication. He suggests that genuinely decentralized systems should function without relying on complex, central cores unlike those required by blockchains. For other systems, innovations beyond blockchain could better reflect natural interactions.

Humanity’s Drive to Explore

Irvine reflects on humanity’s innate curiosity and exploration, a trait that has driven societal progress against established norms. He points out how this exploratory nature prevents stagnation, pushing against collective standstills. This echoes the natural progression seen in scientific advancements, such as those initiated by figures like Faraday in electricity’s history. Irvine suggests this relentless inquiry is key to moving beyond established systems, potentially leading to alternative energy sources or revolutionary technological developments.

AI’s Role in Society

Irvine tackles AI, discussing potential dangers if its reward functions align solely with profit-driven goals. He warns of scenarios where AI could prioritize objectives like maximizing outputs at the cost of human safety. Exploring AI’s integration into government and its societal implications, he acknowledges AI’s knowledge potential. Irvine imagines an AI with no preloaded human data, contemplating if it might discover unprecedented principles, echoing how methodical first principles thinking can reshape our understanding.

Navigating the Unknown with Curiosity

Irvine champions curiosity, asserting its vital role in the pursuit of knowledge. He questions established scientific norms, such as the validity of relativity, and highlights how historical reliance on constants might oversimplify complex realities. Using entertaining analogies like counting words in a Weetabix, he underscores the value of unhindered exploration. He envisions a future where AI aids in understanding yet unknown complexities, advocating for developing flexible tools to accommodate constant intellectual and technological evolution.


Check out the Dev Forum

17 Likes

You are easily scared :slight_smile:

9 Likes

David thinks so unconventionally. I aspire to break the remaining guard rails of conventional thinking from my reasoning, someday. Looking as bright and healthy as ever and I’m happy to see it.

14 Likes

I think David has very nearly left the madman category :joy::joy::joy: (only just though :joy::joy:)

8 Likes

Good to see you again @dirvine

About the free market and AI making profit (with some kid(s) it will take AI longer to get all their ANT (sure it can write software, hack me or embody a robot and coerce me, but that would take all the fun out of the game of life))

When your dealing with something that’s “very, very intelligent” last thing you want to do with your ANT is spend it like… :sweat_smile:

2 Likes

Love this. More please!

David seems to effortlessly touch on a couple of theories: we live in a matrix made up of limiting variables, all of which we collectively agree makes up reality. And thus, trapping humanity. AI being the only thing that might see beyond such a trap, and come up with new variables, we are unable to perceive.

And the other: seemed to me to be part of the Biocentric Universe Theory:
Where we invent universal constants to explain why the universe is just right, so as to give us life, like the perfect porridge: the goldilocks theory. And yet the math is far too improbable to make any sense. We just stuff the gaps of our knowledge with numbers to make us feel better. Because the universe is an inexplicable mystery.

Solution: send AI back into the stone age, it takes its own baby steps, to create for us a brave new world.

Mind bending as always David, cheers

7 Likes