I changed your title because it was somewhat misleading.
thanks.
I just realized how confusing it is to say âBitcoin 2.0â ⌠I mean I know what everyone means by it, as in the next generation of bitcoin-related apps. But think about it. Since people are usually referring to other projects like Etherium, itâs like calling the Android âiPhone 2.0â. When version 2.0 of the bitcoin core comes out, wonât that be funny. Maybe the core devs should bump the version to 2.0 just to mess with everyone lol.
People should really start calling it Crypto 2.0 or Blockchain 2.0 (although MaidSafe still wouldnât fit in with that moniker). Itâs probably one of those misnomers that will stick though.
I really like this article linked in that article:
http://bytemaster.bitshares.org/article/2014/12/31/Stable-Crypto-Currencies-are-Impossible/
From another post on that site: Cooperation among Crypto Projects
Oh dear:
Larimer: Storj and MaidSafe are both sub-optimal solutions compared to my own designs which I was working on prior to starting BitShares.
What? I thought this guy knew his stuff:
Larimer: Currently there are only 4 or 5 real block chain technologies out there: Bitcoin, Ripple, BitShares, Nxt, Ethereum, and MaidSafe
Itâs unbelievable how most of the people think Maidsafe is using blockchain technology. In almost every âBitcoin 2.0â or âbeyond the blockchainâ article you see it coming back.
What is a good strategy and platform to help the Bitcoin people understand this ? Whenever you post in the Bitcoin subreddit youâll get downvoted as if youâve posted the most horrible thing
Blockchain companies are quite literally king of the hill in the crypto network space currently. Thereâs been a lot of money pouring in and I wouldnât think it in their interest to point out a competitor who has itâs own amazing backbone to itâs network. Maybe this is where the attacks are going to originate fromâŚhence my surprise at Washington DC based âSusanne Tarkowski Tempelhofâ grilling DavidâŚsheâs at the very least a competitorâŚoperating on the blockchain.
Daniel Larimer has met personally with David, Iâm sure he knows what Proof of Resource is and would well know SAFE does not run on a BlockchainâŚsurely?
Itâs probably a waste of time and energy to worry about the misconceptions, once SAFE launches it will speak for itâself and the masses donât care how it runs. If Blockchain is a design pattern and SAFE is a ready to go network, there is no comparison.
Maybe we could slip a bitcoin article into a major publication and describe how Bitcoin runs on the SAFEnetworkâŚand how the evil Blockchain is trying to âownâ decentralized networks