Is this (blind signatures) relevant, same, similar, different to what SN is using?
Maybe I haven’t dug deep enough, but it appears to me that bsky is a sort of concept/reference app running on top of the AT Protocol, which is a federated service. You can choose to have bsky host your content, use another service, or host yourself. And content and IDs are portable between.
Seems a great step i the right direction, and not very twitter/medium like… unless I’m missing something.
If they go on to include ads etc, I’ll hop on over to another app, and take it all with me (or that’s the intention / idea)
Also: plus points that the hired Paul Frazee (of beaker, DAT protocol etc) to build it.
I am listening to an interview of the author, and the guy is clearly a conspiracy theorist crackpot who grasps very little of anything and went out there as a layperson “researching” subjects of which he has no understanding how to put them into context.
Three minute in and half of the things he is saying are things he took completely out of context or are strawman arguments, and whenever the evidence is confusing he applies the “they must be out there to get you” stance. If that is your default state, you need therapy.
By the way, I am quite familiar with PsyOPs I have read the original training material from declassified sources in the military, when I was into that, and my major was in psych. Trust me, I am pretty good at finding primary sources.
But it is insane to see psyop in every corner, that’s the hallmark of apophenia and confirmation bias at work, you will see it everywhere if you want to see it there.
Let’s say for the sake of argument that the political and social conspiracies are real.
I also know very well the subjects of the basic sciences, and it is one of the only things we can independently test and verify, and I use that as a bullshit sensor. And he fails miserably, unfortunately. He lacks of the nuanced understanding that comes with expertise.
He plays everything “by ear” and then goes on without much real rigor crossreferencing his factoids.
And, wtf, then he goes off to talking about “wondering why pedophilia is so prevalent” and concludes that satanists are doing it to open portals and increasing their powers, and then he links them to vaccines. And we are in a temporal war with souls that want to reincarnate?
Okay. Sure? lol
Well, I fail to see the relevance of this book with the things I mentioned regarding the industrial revolution, the abuses of the nascent industries and the great depression.
Edit: I managed to get the book and skimmed through it. He did a marvelous job mixing historical facts, real intelligence/military psyops with false flags ops, and then pushing the narrative further interweaving them with speculation, citations from unreliable sources, and taking events out of context. The worst kind of lies are the ones that are mixed with the truth.
He isn’t following his own suggestion of not falling into confirmation bias lol
https://divestos.org/misc/e.txt
A very interesting read on the e OS for android phones and how it has many privacy and security flaws.
Amazing
Nope. Military conflicts are only a small part of it.
Certainly … but I’m only reading and responding to the shallow views you appear to be posting.
This needs to be a new thread if you really want to dig into it, I won’t say anymore in this one and I’m not really that interested in the convo anyway as I don’t believe you will really listen. But if you really want it, start a new thread and we will take any points you want to make one at a time in the utmost detail.
Help!
I recall advocacy and discussion for “Object Capabilities” in preference to the simpler but much less useful, some would say flawed, use of Access Control Lists in providing control over who can do what to what data on Safe Network.
I though there was a dedicated thread and that @joshuef or @bochaco had looked in detail and come up with a method of implementing Object Capabilities in SN. However I can’t find either searching for “Object Capabilities” here or on the dev forum.
So I probably imagined that! Or not. Can anyone confirm or even find where an OC implementation was discussed?
I have found some relevant discussion but not the detailed stuff I recall, the output of an investigation by someone of how it might be done.
Can you give a couple of examples of the claimed advantages of Object Capabilities over ACLs wrt SAFE?
do you mean this from Dec 2018?
more deep dive detail on ACL handling in the objects capability model
https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/concepts/kernel
somewhat related its patented CN tech , that said worth having a look re:concepts of object capability and ACL weaved with concurrency in async form.
Rholang is an open and scalable blockchain language designed for speed, reliability and formal process orchestration build on latest research in the reflective high order process calculus. Rholang runs on the Rchain world computer algorithmically constrained to obey our rules.
Thanks, but no I don’t think so. I started that topic.
What I recall, right or wrong is that somebody posted a very good conference presentation video singing the praises of Object Capabilities, and that after the discussion which that facilitated, there was somebody from the team did an in detail attempt to figure out a way to implement that on SN.
That topic came up in my search but with only one hit I think for the term “object capabilities”, but I haven’t checked the full thread.
I believe we were poking at macaroons
way back when… Is that what you’re describing perhaps?
And from there, from a UX pov, we got to permission manifests and data labels
Hope & pray for peace.
"In the summer of 1914, none of the great powers realized that they were sleepwalking toward disaster. … "
You can still access Claude through poe.com if it’s not available in your country.
Discourse has a plug-in which supports ActivityPub, which means Mastodon and countless other AP supporting apps:
Came across this nice little historical analysis today. Not sure where to put it, so will drop it here as I don’t think it deserves it own thread, but if people want to discuss it I will move it to a new thread.
“The most successful fraud of the nineteenth century” --Sydney-based Catholic Press