Lunatic is an Erlang-inspired runtime for WebAssembly
By combining the fault-tolerance and massive concurrency of Erlang with the capability-based security of WebAssembly, it creates a powerful programming model.
We currently provide libraries to take full advantage of Lunatic’s features for:
The Guardian have been very wrong on Assange for years but in recent years they have consistently called for his release and published editorial and articles, including from the former (previously very anti Assange) editor, though I’ve been critical of Rushbridger’s mealy mouthed pieces on the topic all the same.
Many in different UK press have come around to this view as well. I don’t read them all so can’t be more specific, but it’s inaccurate to suggest that the Guardian or UK press in general have not advocated against his extradition.
This isn’t a defense of the press, which have I think behaved abysmally on this issue for years and are still not doing as much as I’d like about it.
My point is that you paint an inaccurate picture. Perhaps you should read The Guardian before commenting on its position?
I do read the occaisional link to the Graun - mostly yours. I will check again on their position re Assange but it matters little - Sunak and those before him are all licking Yankee arse.
If the Grauniad had any guts at all it would be calling for the RN divers/submariners who destroyed the pipelines to be tried for war crimes - and every single person in the chain of command that approved the operation
But until then Mark, I am sorry, Guardian readership is an inadequate figleaf covering up much nastiness.
Anyhow stay safe and well, if you can’t be right, at least be cheerful
Too much press is pandering to positive feedback… the rare occasion that real negative feedback occurs and a storm kicks off… pity that messenger. So muchof the future is about proper handling negative feedback…
Im not positive, but isnt quantum entanglement what causes spooky action at a distance?
If so i dont see how more than 2 things could be entangled.
But im no expert.
Edit.
On second thoughts, maybe spooky action is only 1 very soecific type on qe.
Only had 1 coffee since i woke, not really in gear as yet.
Yes, you can have as many entangled particles as you want. It might be rather cumbersome to achieve it but it can in principle be done. Multipartite entangled states actually lie at heart of a special type of quantum computation, called measurement-based quantum computation.19 Feb 2013
Thanks, then those questions… suppose you have multiple entangled black holes, in fact a very large number, or an effectively infinite number, what would that be like?
Maybe it would be as if all space was collapsed into a singularity: no space, infinite gravity (which implies I think) no time.
Would that be like before the big bang?
And suppose there’s a tiny chance that one of those black holes could be ejected from the entanglement, should that happen what next?
I’ve already speculated but let’s suppose it might result in an enormous release of energy as that separated black hole, accelerated by the pull of infinite gravity towards the speed of light… would that be like the big bang…?
Unredacted e-mails sent between people who should have let us have information earlier finally revealed.
Of course, enough time has passed, and the news cycle has moved on to the price of cheese so that no real follow up will take place and no action will be taken. You can’t vote on making a meaningful change to your government, but at least you have a vote on which part of which animal your previous health secretaries can eat in public. What fictional horror movie am I living in?
The same mistake/behavior will be made the next time we need help and there is nothing we can do about it.