You know you are replying to a 2 year old post do you??
Here you are… [quote=“Kingslanding, post:18, topic:3542”]
When an ex-employee questioned this project last year, all questions raised were also ignored and dodged.
[/quote]
are you sure??
This, in particular has been discussed many times on this forum. A group size is chosen in any dht to be of a size that’s infeasible to lose the whole group (think whole, quorum etc. as same thing) in a refresh time. A refresh is generally 30 or 60 mins, but in SAFE the nodes are directly connected, so refresh is as close to network speed as possible. This makes this significantly less feasible.
Regardless of that, with disjoint groups and data_chains, merge/split of groups is handled as a nat…
Like this one?
Interesting Lee did work for us and is also a member of this forum, I must check his posts at some time to find these issues he mentions warning us about or at least get a sniff of such in between the lines of posts or something.
Basically much of this is FUD and surprising really as a contract Engineer that was not working in or seemed to have knowledge of the areas he seems now to “understand”. Lots of time spent here though which would be nice if it were focused on issues that would help. Th…
or this one??
A theorem is a theorem until it’s proven or broken, like Zooko’s triangle (btw Zooko is insanely good and thoughtful) and bitcoin. All the flat earth postulates and so on. new/innovative means having tools we never previously had, SAFE is no different, look at zk-snarks and the “impossible” halting problem. I have no ego regarding all these theorems, I do not fear them or ignore them. As @digipl says there are always reasons not to try and assume failure before you start, we don’t go that way …
or this one???
22 Likes