Can I double Like this?
There should definitely be room for people to point out technical issues related to the project. I agree with @BIGbtc that the Dev forum would be a better place to have this discussion.
Almost half of this thread consists of posts that are off-topic and express peopleâs sentiment about this thread. They believe itâs just here to spread FUD and that itâs taking up a lot of valuable time on MaidSafeâs part. Whether this is the case or not doesnât really matter. I think a lot of people, myself included, have a hard time understanding the more technical posts. Since we canât verify what is said makes sense or not we have to rely on others or our gut feeling, and thatâs whatâs being expressed in these posts.
By continuing this discussion on the Dev forum the discussion should stay on topic much more easily. I believe that if @vtnerd is sincere in his intentions and brings these things up to assist in making the SAFE Network more robust he wouldnât object to continuing the discussion on the Dev forum.
9 Likes
Would Like that post if âis sincere in his intentionsâ wasnât there; but thatâs a matter of opinion, which is quite pointless to dwell on, really (the whole matter of with well intention or not). But anyway, absolutely agreed wholeheartedly for everything else.
I wonder if Edgierme can even understand whatâs being said. (I sure canât, but I donât try at all, because I personally donât like vtnerdâs style of posting. But also his efforts would be much better suited for Github.)
1 Like
And thatâs whatâs used by scammers promising the moon too. And thatâs why itâs important to have debate and solution finding on technical grounds.
Conveniently neglected to include my suggestion to move it to the DEV forum.
Fair enough, I missed that.
Regardless, discussions like this should be continued for the long-term benefit whether here or in some other place. Pure technical grounds. We all love privacy. We all love freedom. We can discuss that all day thatâs great. But whatâs more important is how to get there technically. If thereâs something wrong, then it should be dealt with not bury your head in the sand. The true test is technical debate and opening that open to eyes of the many: if a project is sound, that builds strength. Even Einsteinâs genius was open to peer review.
And tell us all how you come to characterize this as the âmost technical thread this forum has seen in a long timeâ. Thats a slam to many here.
How is that a slam when you yourself want this âtechno stuffâ moved to the DEV forum and Github? Itâs the truth.
And you keep missing it. You rant pointlessly.
Did you see my suggestion to move it to DEV? Im way ahead of you on this hotshot.
Quote from IO Coin Slack.
âxxxxxx is currently traveling, and we are behind black screens with code work, unlike some of these characters that seem to want to have long drawn out chats in philosophical and or technical conversations. If people want hints on how to or how it works they will get the time to look at our code in due time. Feature creep is very dangerous, itâs one of the main areas where inexperienced devs fall. Our team has to be very judicious about requests and know when to simply say âitâs not our priority right nowâ in order for us to meet our goals and deadlinesâ.
Thereâs a not so old Latin saying that very succinctly sums up the MO of vtnerd.
âMerda taurorum animas conturbitâ
For those about to rock, we salute you!
Sorry, my Greek is not the best anymore. 
1 Like