Clearly states a preference for the current less democratic process and clearly states elections wouldn’t improve the system.[quote=“Melvin, post:45, topic:6049”]
and asked you to start doing something instead of repeatedly discussing the same subject and points with us
[/quote]
This is where you go wrong really…what I’m doing is discussing it on the forum and having the arguments. What none of the mods seem to get (despite me saying it many times) is that I’m not really interested in discussing anything with mods, rather the community. Your opinions on whether I have said enough already (in this now off the front page even category) means very little to me and does not serve you well in my own opinion.[quote=“Melvin, post:45, topic:6049”]
We now know your ideas on how you(?) think you can improve the forum
[/quote]
No…lol…I didn’t even make a proposal to be fair - . I didn’t even start the thread…lol - It’s also a suggestion to democratise the modding recruitment process by having elections…what more do you need to know?[quote=“Melvin, post:45, topic:6049”]
how are we going to find out if your proposal is wanted/works/is possible?
[/quote]
We discuss openly on the forum - once firm ideas of how best to implement the changes have been formed, a proposal can be made. Do you have any suggestions yourself as to how modding recruitment could be democratised further to provide more accountability/transparency etc or are you in agreement with @happybeing that the current less democratic (un-elected) system is optimum…democratically/accountability etc speaking? 