Well, you’ve heard from at least 3 longstanding community members over a period of time in regard to aspects of moderation, how recruitment worls,etc, none of which seems to have changed anything from our perspective - but I too would like to know the broader community’s opinion, maybe this would help.
Yes, the evidence would seem to support this view… 
I wouldn’t really, as I’ve discussed at length, read things here, followed links etc and I’m still confused. Not surprising when it is also admitted to be “complex”, and "not yet fully modelled!..lol
He didn’t though did he? He asked if it would. It appears he is being warned retrospectively for past demeanors - not the actual post here. The public warning was unnecessary in my view.
I think this is a good idea - not in the way you probably think, but to suggest elections for each mod position. Incumbent mods will face challengers to their seats individually and can occur at regular intervals. If accepted by the Community then the community forum owner ( ) can decide whether to adopt the new system or not. Whatever the answer, the Community will be more informed.
I will open a thread in Meta to discuss these and other plans and to run a campaign - obviously the goal of gaining support for any plans to change the modding system is severely hindered by Meta being taken off the front page by the “Old Guard” 
.which provides a much smaller audience to address to garner support.
Anyway, not ready for elections yet as campaigning to do first.
So to all mods…don’t get too comfortable…the revolution is nigh.