It’s in the loan application opportunity topic. Msg 24 or so. Sorry no idea how to link with phone
1 Like
5 Likes
However they sell them it doesn’t change the fact liquidity should be higher on average. I don’t think they have even really entered the chainrift market full tilt yet. Maybe waiting to see if the price will fluff up. I am not gonna help fluff it up til I see those coins on the market though. I think the big whales are saying the same thing. Show us that promised liquidity and then see how the market looks.
I’m fairly sure means just that… fairly sure lol.
I nvr claimed it did not happen.
Since I nvr saw it, and no one else claims to have other than yourself, and I nvr saw you mention it before now, I made my judgement.
More liquidity does not imply more demand. I’m not seeing signs of a tight squeeze caused by demand outstripping available supply (liquidity).
I think you are putting the cart before the horse.
If anyone has a spare second please upvote Delta app exchange request to have the Chainrift market added.
4 Likes
I just registered on Chainrift using @JPL’s referral link. I tried to get verified by uploading a picture of my passport, but I get this message, even though I tried using .jpg.
“Sorry, this file type is not supported.
Please upload a valid image of type JPG or PNG.”
Ping @ferdousbhai, @ales85
I generated this custom referral link:
https://www.chainrift.com/?R=Sascha
Did you check the case of the .jpg? I’ve had experiences in the past when a website would accept image.JPG but not image.jpg.
1 Like
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried both now, but no cigar.
Moving funds between bittrex and chainrift reminds me how slow and annoying bitcoin/omni actually is. I can’t wait till the day the default crypto token is SAFE, so I no longer have to use this relic known as bitcoin.
7 Likes
Well my personal demand is higher then the market can really sustain unless I want to create some really insane volatility. I am not even a big whale. I have to feel for the big guys its maybe too small to even bother trading at all. I don’t think its healthy to wait until people start fighting hard over the scraps that are available. Sure there might be a short term pump (which I am guessing is why other people, not you, have been so hostile towards the idea of liquidity that might prevent that lol.) In the long run you have a highly unstable price though, and that’s not good for keeping people in the market.
Sounds to me like you want cheap coins, no one wants to sell you cheap coins, so you want maidsafe to, out of the coins they need to sell.
Good luck with that.
2 Likes
As a trader your demand is transient and temporary. You hold for as long as you need to to make a profit and then try to pick your next entry point to do the same. This demand nets out to zero, unless you choose to invest as well.
As a trader, you are trying to read whether the price has been over bought or under sold, relative to the underlying demand, so you can predict where the market will move next. In short, you are trying to bridge the gap between the two points, to turn a profit.
To put it another way, investors generate lasting demand and traders provide liquidity by bridging gaps between investor buying and selling.
It sounds to me that you want more traders to play with, not investors.
2 Likes
I would not disagree with you guys entirely. Yes I want to buy coins at the bottom and sell them later for a profit. I would contend that HODLers also don’t want to buy coins at an inflated price just because ChainRift has not yet reached the liquidity we had on polo either though.
Maidsafe was supposed to be providing liquidity. If they are doing so it sure is not much. I would love to hear from @dirvine on this issue. When can we expect to see a noticeable amount of the MAID they need to sell eventually anyways on the market? I would say the sooner the better. I think right now bigger players are holding off because there is just no way to do the volume they want to without walking into an obvious trap (ie pumping the price THEN that supply hits)
To be honest, I think the price dropped due to polo delist and has not fully recovered.
So most ppl are negative in their investment and wont sell.
When the price does recover we will probably see a little more trading, but maybe not, as I think we’ve had a pretty bad price imo for the tech we have, I wont sell at these prices.
1 Like
Not selling = buying IMO. if you won’t sell at this price you should buy it up to just under where you would sell. As I have mentioned that sell book is paper thin so like it’s not that much you would be buying anyways.
Anyways even if you look at >1500 prices (about where we were at before polo delisting announcement) I still don’t see a lot of sell orders. To me that just seems unreasonable to buy it up higher right now. Clearly the Chainrift market is a subset of the former polo market, not vice versa. So IMO it’s not worth more and the only reason it might go higher is if people are desperate for liquidity. I don’t think that’s enticing to people that want to trade high volumes. If we want to grow the Chainrift market back to the size the polo market was we need to invite our whales back.
Well now we are getting kinda off topic. If you want to discuss price I am very active in the thread for that. All I really wanted to bring up here was that @dirvine promised Maidsafe would be providing liquidity on ChainRift. Just wondering are they already (the never promised it would be LOTS of liquidity lol) If not, can you at least confirm this is still the plan? Any timeframes you want to share on providing that liquidity would also be most welcomed!
Please consider in the title of the page (what appears in the tab of the browser) changing the order to put price first.
eg below is bittrex tab on the left, chainrift on the right.
When many tabs are open the chainrift tab would possibly be more useful with the price first.
Also a very small thing, but is MAID/BTC the right ticker for that price? It would seem 0.00001172 MAID per BTC is back to front, wouldn’t it be that many BTC per MAID? Or is it incorrect to interpret “/” in the ticker symbol as “per”?
2 Likes
A consistent way to read it is
MAID/BTC = MAID “priced in” BTC
You are correct that ‘per’ is incorrect.
2 Likes
As long as the sell wall starts at 5$ 
Great suggestion, although I see the pros and cons both.
What if you have multiple coin pairs open? Then you won’t know which price is for which coin!
1 Like