Debate about central planning vs. free market for negotiating the PUT price

[SmoothOperatorGR]

@JoeSmithJr

Sorry but the Safe network is going to be a tool for the loss of many people no matter what you want. Terrorism, human trafficking, child pornography: pick your choice, they will all be there. It’s a tool given to people to achieve potentially worse things than making 5% more than that other dude.

should we outlaw roads? should we all walk into forrests to move from point a to point b in order to help combat illegal things that use the roads?

I believe anti-censhorship should be a right to everyone and if we want to combat illegal stuff we should find ways with anticeshorship in place

@JoeSmithJr

If that’s how you think it would work, firstly, I suspect you have never tried trading and have no idea just how fiercely equalizing competition is and, secondly, you ignore we’re talking about as simple as asking payment for a finite and tangible resource. It’s really not such a radical concept. On the other hand, demanding that prices are set by a central government (that is, your simple algo) is a radical idea.

dude you blind or brain dead? people die from hunger and people have billions! you testify such a system on the safe network where one with a game plan can dominate the safecoins and one without a gameplan make nothing!!!

@JoeSmithJr

Wow. Is that what we want? World domination at all cost, consciously refusing a way to give people choices? Not that it would work, I’m just questioning the approach.

by promoting the absolute value of anticeshorship and equal access to rewards we get more than we lose!