What is your favorite name for a SafeCoin analogy to BTC’s Satoshi? (reboot) divs = irvines, troons, and ayrs?

[jlpell]

Yes, divs, a simple efficient description. Better than dirvs, not as cute as divi. It is growing on me… referring to the most basic unit of safecoin divisibility ie. maximum divisions (whether that be at least 2^32 divs or maybe 2^248 as in the project safe doc, depending on final implementation). Coincidentally it also sounds like a name for a sharp pointy object, which may lead to a good marketing gimmick, or just reinforce the idea of repeatedly cutting/dividing a safecoin. Also sounds like “dibs” which in American is slang for “I own that”. Also coincidentally, divine has been referred to by name multiple times on this forum by accident or otherwise over the years…

@Anders

But if you for example want to change your name to divine, then if some other user has the name divine and an ID that starts with ABC… then you would be unable to change your name. Or?

@whiteoutmashups

Has anyone else ever thought they saw the word “divine” even reading @dirvine ?

@davidpbrown

I think somewhere recently divine did suggest the key prospects for company profit; so, I’m just hoping those are being hammered home and having not seen it on a lazy first pass I’m wondering if they are clear to all.

@anon81773980

I support divine’s idea. We should test first before going live. So it makes sense to give everybody free 50 fakecoins for testing purpose.

@cl0ck3d

Here’s an idea why not get @divine to make it so that you have to create a secondary pin when creating a safe network log on that when entered scrubs all your data?

@lubinew

I have deep confidence in divine and other devs and therefore I invested a big portion of our family wealth. If the project is successful and the price goes to 2,50 USD before the launch, I have to sell at least something… otherwise I would have almost all my eggs in one basket.

@Wrath9

Thank you for all the hard work you and your team have done so far divine.
I hope this gets up and running before pollies like Teresa may regulate the current internet.

@happybeing

The obvious way to do this is to limit the number of names per account (as already planned), and to make it hard to create or maintain multiple accounts. This would be useful for other reasons (making it hard to attack the network) so extra points if we achieve it.

Both are hard problems, over to you @divine

@goindeep

You’re doing <#divine entity’s> work, thank you!

hhahahaha I had to read that twice I thought it said dirvine lol, speaking of which we should see if the guys are willing to have some fun with the network and maybe put some god like oracle bots as easter eggs throughout it for us lol