The bug itself didn’t threaten the entire existence really, it was the stupidly huge amount of cash behind it that helped it get to that point .
1 Like
So a smaller amount of cash would have prevented it? 
And how much might that be? (How long is a piece of string?)
The existential bug plus puerile, destructive, self-justifying people are the sufficient and necessary conditions for being “DAOd.” Better programming and longer testing would mitigate the one, while pest eradication would mitigate the other.
1 Like
No one even said this.
The answer was in regards to the severity of such a bug, which if less money was on the line would of been less severe . The degree of severity was increased purely by the shear amount of cash that was invested into the project.
$5000 placed into this project with the discovery of such a bug and it would of been fixed and caused much less problems and been fixed more easily .
The severity of the bug is increased depending on the risk involved in such a bug , the more money the more at risk and the more to risk . less amount of money would of made the bug less damaging and easier to deal with problem decreasing the severity of the bug
1 Like
The only useful thing you have said. Bug bounties are great.
Nah i think you missed the point again . It is most likely my fault i am typing like an idiot .
If the project had raised a total of $5000 , The bug wouldn’t of had such a huge amount of risk of failure , The bug wouldn’t of threatened such a huge 200+ million dollar project and force another coin that you built on top of wouldn’t also be at increased risk.
If the same % lost or siphoned out of the project at $5000 market cap, then the bug would of been a pretty minor easy to fix bug with much less at risk .
The amount of money at risk in the project made the bug a hell of a lot more severe than it is , the relation of what is at risk(financially) weighted against the bug(purely by itself) increases it’s severity 10 fold .
The bug on it’s own was pretty minor a fairly normal encountered bug while programming , the amount of cash held in the project is what made this bug go from minor to hugely severe.
I got the point, I just don’t agree with it.
And stop using idiots as a prop! Idiots have rights too, you know! 
2 Likes