I had a quick look and found the following.
I think there is more, but can’t be sure. Other search terms might be keyloggers and malware but I think those will pull in many threads, not necessarily so focussed.
I’m saying if the NSA or any other government wants to hack the manufacturing process it’s going to be much more expensive and difficult for the end user and for manufacturers.
Now you have a central point of failure which are the trusted foundries. You can’t trust the hardware manufacturers nor can you know with 100% certainty that the hardware doesn’t contain a hardware trojan unless you’ve made the hardware yourself and inspected every step of the process.
I would say it’s possible to do i…
I’m wondering about the value to SAFE Network of using Ubuntu as the basis of SAFE OS, or Snappy Ubuntu (see article) in devices such as ePlug.
I’m not sure it’s the way to go, but interested because Ubuntu might gain widespread IoT adoption of Snappy, and how this might help SAFE.
Can the end user experience be stable without a Project SAFE specific OS? We know cloud models can be stable without worrying about the OS but what about Project SAFE? Response by @happybeing to a question about the stability of end user experience seemed to suggest that an actual Project SAFE OS may be needed for a water tight end users experience. A water tight experience would seem to be a precondition of trusting the system and its spreading.
Imagine:
Julian Assange, whose advice was t…
Bootloader!! Duh!
I keep bumping into this, I am sure there is a reason
1 Like