SafeNet needs a completely new communication protocol

Maybe I did not express myself very precisely, but I quoted proposal of @bochaco’s,, which (if I understand correctly) would be an intermediate variant between communication based on CRDT data structures stored in the SN, and the communication of fast, free messages saved locally - described by me in the previous post.

Bochaco proposed - “E.g. perhaps implementing the Lightning Network protocol (over DBCs) where a mobile farmer can create channels where messages will be routed through, obtaining tiny fractions of SNT as rewards for it, which would be the mobile farming reward. So all separate from the nodes farmers which take care of Safe persisted data.” - this means a lightweight protocol for quick messages but paid (indirect variant).
Whereas I agree with the proposal to create a Lightning Network protocol, but I believe that for saving gossips the participation of mobile farmers and the creation of channels is not necessary, because SafeNet itself guarantees a sufficient level of privacy and security.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

1 Like