Using my laptop I can access the Figma mockups 
and am very impressed. Good ideas and a very understandable presentation.
WebID v SafeID
There’s one feature that doesn’t appear to follow conventions to maximise Solid compatibility, and I don’t think this has been discussed with the community - so am curious: what’s the proposed SafeID implementation, including naming, and what is Maidsafe’s approach to compatibility with Solid/WebID?
For clarity:
- Safe ID appears to have the form
@name - Figma mockup shows browser recognises this directly given a URL with the form
safe://@name - a Solid ID / WebID is a URL with a fragment, and I don’t think URLs can contain ‘@’. So a SAFE WebID would be something like
safe://id.happybeing#me
If we deviate from the latter, it makes it harder to provide compatibility with Solid apps and harder for people already familiar with WebIDs, so again I’m curious about @Maidsafe’s direction here.
I realise Solid compatibility is not the b-all and end all here, but would like to understand where @Maidsafe are headed.