From Nov 22nd dev update:
Related Safe dev forum post.
Some layman questions: Will this mean that indices must be maintained to access the six different RDF triple patterns for each entry[1] and time-space trade off will that bring? Query complexity[2] vs say a native Triple store or graphDB[3]? Is a native RDF triple store (or Graph database[4]) overlay feasible for the Safe Network?
I found some other interesting related topics questioning how RDF and storage/query methods could be simplified for developers while doing a quick background research on this question, have posted to a new topic here.
[1] CumulusRDF: Linked Data Management on Nested Key-Value Stores
http://iswc2011.semanticweb.org/fileadmin/iswc/Papers/Workshops/SSWS/Ladwig-et-all-SSWS2011.pdf
[2] NoSQL Databases for RDF: An Empirical Evaluation
[3] A survey of RDF storage approaches (“The problem of indexing RDF graphs”)
https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01299496/document
[4] What-are-the-differences-between-a-Graph-database-and-a-Triple-store?