Tried a summary of the twitter highlights between Vlad and Maidsafe, with some slight
scaling problems in “paint”.
In the begining Vlad was quite arogant and condescending, it seemd he had some problem
to behave like a big boy.
He was honest about that he is heavily biased towards Ethereum.
With his compliment I think it is was his way of saying, excellent work, but he did not use exactly those words. 
A few people challenged him, which was very good, and together with the replies from the
team he finaly started acting like a big boy and gave some usefull criticism. Rigor and liveness was his main critcism besides from some early comments which seemed like quite weak arguments about names and so on.
@bart , @dirvine . @pierrechevalier83, What do you guys think where the most interesting about the critcism and what, if something, will be improved upon and what did you guys feel was just cheap shoots from Vlad.
I read about “statistics rigor” on wikipedia and the mentioned that there is some programs for testing mathematical rigor, Mizar system, HOL Light, and Metamath, is that something you guys have done or thinking about doing in the future. When it comes to review of Parsec, is there people you guys have have in mind that you think can help, is it possible that there are any professors in math, computer science or other that could help, maybe possible for Maidsafe to give a free lecture or something, if a university would help out. 
