New FATF guideline to prohibit anonymous p2p transactions or hosting

[anon57419684]

@Dwieluns2

I believe so.

What’s up today? (Part 1)

@draw SAFE isn’t even here yet and we’re possibly already a major step closer to: From the article, “For instance, it enables the creation of “deniable” encryption, in which you can plausibly convince an attacker that you sent an entirely different message from the one you really sent”. Also re: ““functional” encryption, in which you can give chosen users different levels of access to perform computations using your data.” it would be interesting if SAFE data permissions could be baked dire…

Starlink with safe net will be unstoppable

Another step closer to this with rosen: censorship-resistant proxy tunnel :: spacetime.dev. Relevant comment from author at rosen: censorship-resistant proxy tunnel | Lobsters It implements a modular, censorship-resistant proxy tunnel that encapsulates arbitrary application traffic inside some cover protocol (currently only HTTPS). I’ve tested it against nDPI and a commercial DPI engine developed by Palo Alto Networks. Both detected TOR traffic using Rosen as ordinary HTTPS …