Sorry @chriso , pedantry again, but should
willie@mir:~/safeup$ sudo target/release/safeup node
not be more correct as
safeup safenode ?
Sorry @chriso , pedantry again, but should
willie@mir:~/safeup$ sudo target/release/safeup node
not be more correct as
safeup safenode ?
Iām not completely sure about this one. I think client and node are easy to understand, and safeup client and safeup node read a bit better than safeup safe and safeup safenode, but Iām willing to have my mind changed.
I fully agree they read better, I am simply being pedantic and looking for consistency.
I too am willing to have my mind changed where ācommon senseā trumps consistency ![]()
Well, I think itās consistent to use client and node. If node was going to be changed to safenode, then for consistency, client would be changed to safe.
BTW safeup passes cargo-audit with no complaints
Congratulations
![]()
willie@gagarin:~/projects/maidsafe/jacderida/safeup$ cargo-audit audit
Fetching advisory database from `https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db.git`
Loaded 537 security advisories (from /home/willie/.cargo/advisory-db)
Updating crates.io index
Scanning Cargo.lock for vulnerabilities (255 crate dependencies)
I think this links to the previous release?
Or Iām getting some cache issue.<\s>
Eh, disregard from that ![]()
![]()
oops /me checks
they are coming so thick and fast these past few daysā¦
confirmed Release Safe Network v0.2.0/v0.15.5/v0.22.0/v0.8.0/v0.84.0/v0.82.0/v0.82.0/v0.76.0 Ā· maidsafe/safe_network Ā· GitHub
is the correct link
IDK what happened there but you seem to have linked to the latest, but it doesnāt contain what I would expect ![]()
Iām in the bath now though so my lookup-abilities are somewhat limited ![]()
TMI +chars ![]()
Actually, I think something went wrong with the last release. Investigating.
And Scotland beating Spain. Something mighty strange going down.
We went one better, much better
![]()
Btw, thereās a release for every PR that gets merged, so most of the time there probably wonāt be huge differences from release to release.
Just as well you got safeup running then if we are going to get a release for every PR merge now.
Why the change? We were going weeks without a release a while backā¦
Not that Iām complainingā¦
You just determined to see that safeup tool getting well used ![]()
You reincarnated Ally McLeod?!?!?!!
Whatās the odds for a test net tomorrow?
Bear in mind, the update command isnāt implemented in safeup just yet!
We changed to doing a release for every PR a while back, but sometimes we get a problem with publishing a crate, which can take days to fix, and no releases go out in the mean time.