Yes, I think that is what we all need (inc me), much more info.
It cannot be one body but a consensus of many bodies and absolutely not governments deciding.
Thsi is not about identifying any person. It’s only particular files (unless they are encrypted in some way that is not self encryption etc.).
I am sure we all do, it’s a prime reason for the projects existence.
Node operator, i.e. the human running the node. To ban a chunk then all nodes need to agree to do so.
I don’t think those folks will ever be satisfied and they will 100% push for greater control. But we don’t want them to be deciding this stuff in any way.
I agree, it could.
We won’t in any way.
100%
We don’t intend to take a lead from any gov body in terms of what the network does. This is a much wider body of bodies that we trust has identified abhorrent (extreme) data and that is agreed by many separate bodies across the world.
In no way would any of us trust a single gov to do this, or a union of govs (5 eyes etc.) as that would defeat the whole network.
True, I hope we never get there though as single clients would be weaker if they show they can be controlled. It’s all a balance.