piluso
June 29, 2020, 2:02am
7
We had similar discussions in the past:
I wish that those fringe markets were adopting it later.
This network is bigger than that, and by being first associated with black markets may limit it’s perception on its capabilities.
There are big advantages for corporations and small business owners, and tackling these problems first would generate a good feedback for the general public to use it.
It is like a ceramic knife being promoted for cooking, and then getting some edge cases of misuse in crimes; compared to a knife mainly promot…
You guys are missing the forest.
Yes, it is a perfect dark web, but it is also a practical dark web.
Being a “dark web” is just a side effect, a feature and a nice cherry on the top.
The actual product here is the “new internet”. The myriad of functionalities that the SafeNetwork is bringing to the masses is freaking incredible.
Every single user and company out there would be able to lower their IT and insurance costs drastically, every information can be “leak proof” and “failure proof” wi…
Yep, I share your concern, that’s why I feel it is critical to build legitimate uses of the networks first for enterprises before the dark web users start using for their illegal stuff.
It is the difference in the narrative from:
this amazing useful network that has unfortunately been co-opted by criminals.
To:
This criminal network.
How it gets perceived will help or hurt the mass adoption.
And yes, the ideal would be to have a very useful legitimate applications (both for individuals and for enterprise) before it becomes coopted by the underworld.
9 Likes