Appendable Data RFC

Hey guys, just finished updating the RFC. So we decided to make what was listed as the Alternative approach as our main approach as it is more type-safe (instead of dealing with Vec<u8> as previously). There were a few other changes regarding how things should be routed to final destination, hint on what APIs to use and how vaults should sort out partial deletion via POST. It would be nice if anybody has any comments before we finalise the rfc.

11 Likes