What does a chap have to do to rid himself of this? I mean, I’ve tried…
you could try to sneak into IF as a builder - just join a team - that would disqualify you
Come on, let’s hear it…
…actually maybe not
Would bochaco also be possible to vote for now or would he be seen as a Autonomi dev?
That’s the type of statement I hear from individuals who are ready to up sticks and leave.
I’ve never known such a complicated project and it’s getting more and more complicated.
I’m hearing that the solution works, but I have absolutely no idea what the status of anything is.
Here is all you need to know, Bertie boy
Bazza is not getting the gig, the season tickets have been sold, there will be no more talk of 49ers, 2nd is the best you will ever be for decades to come.
Your brogues need polished, its the marching season but wrap up warm, as you have noticed, it is cold in our shadow.
Prediction: Rang3rs within 5 years Mike Ashley will still be selling your kit. Look forward to glamour ties against Benburb. Will your ANT bags pay your bowling/golf club fees cos you will have lost interest in the fitba. #WeLaff
feel free to use dweb or ant-tp to test viewing public data on autonomi and see how fast it is for you to use:
pointer, scratchpad and graphEntry are working now - sometimes it’s not super-fast but it’s at decent speed and the first apps are emerging
@Bux Do you have 3 votes from me? I voted once on the page and when I click on the button to ‘Nominate Again’ it opened a new window. I have a feeling that will have started the process again and you’ll only get the 2 votes I did on that one. Sorry to be a pain!
Thank you @Bux for reaching out. I am sure many also will be encouraged by this.
It is a good idea to have some community members, who are well respected to be additional Judges in the process. Does help to improve confidence in the process and more importantly improve the perception that this is an open source project.
I am sure that all those nominated will do us proud and be of great assistance to David and the other Judges.
Perhaps dumb suggestion and adds one too many steps
The suggestion
Perhaps rather than just taking the number of nominations, have this as who gets nominated and accepted (maybe top 10 or 15) and then a second round where people submit 5 choices from that list and take the top 5.
The reason being is that people may not have thought about a person when nominating and also some of those nominated will refuse. This way makes the votes more meaningful.
Not sure if after all these years I am even qualified to vote. For the record, I picked @fergish, @riddim and @traktion. Can we get a list of those who are DQ’d due to participation in IF, if that is even a thing? Extremely grateful to have such an overwhelming amount of talent to choose from.
There was a lady here a few years ago with a marketing background with Fortune 500 companies etc. Can anyone remember her name?
She’s not the only one. Obviously cannot speak on her behalf, but I suspect her absence has something to do with the complete lack of seriousness as it pertains to the marketing of the project.
It’s great that the team is doing this and I think it will contributed to the much needed reset in the relationship between the team and the community. Appreciate those first steps Bux and we as a community will put our best foot forward as well.
As for my nominees, I think there are two people that would take the responsibility very serious and would absolutely shine in the role: @happybeing and @Sotros25
I hope they’re both up for the task because it would add so much technical knowhow, business sense and entrepreneurial mindset to the panel.
I’ll second that. @Sotros25 is a major motivator. @happybeing is wickedly intelligent. Two totally different personality types though from what I have observed. If the two could collaborate effectively offline, however, it would be insanely productive.
Not sure @Sotros25 is about much now I’m voting @aatonnomicc he’s not getting away with it
ill be stern but fair